I don’t know whose fault this is, maybe DeviantArt (for example) makes it hard for web crawlers to view the tags, but it’s definitely annoying to see very obvious AI images that are tagged as AI on the website, or also sometimes on a website dedicated to AI images, still show up on the image search page.
But honestly thanks for at least trying duckies.
Ja7sh_The_Donkey@piefed.zip 7 hours ago
DDG uses public lists among other things, their claim.
Detection of AI is based on a list. Not some form of intelligent keyword matching algorithm.
SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 1 hour ago
Is there an open source browser add-on for it yet? I think this is gonna be just as vital as ublock origins is right now. The internet will soon just be unusable without filtering out AI content.
Kraiden@piefed.social 6 hours ago
Ye, this. It’s not really their fault. There’s no protocol for responsible sites to flag AI content to the search engines. They can’t really be expected to examine each and every site’s bespoke tagging system for their specific way of declaring AI imagery. I hope that changes soon, and DDG could be the pioneers of it if they wanted.
halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 4 hours ago
Isn’t this one of the things that embedding C2PA in generated images is supposed to help with? Even though it predates the current AI bubble, it is a provenance system. With a quick search, it seems like many of the big players are on board already.
grue@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
“You said you wanted no AI, so we gave you no AI!”
wander1236@sh.itjust.works 5 hours ago
It can still be mildly infuriating