If it came on a physical disc, you could use it as a frisbee.
California colleges bought everyone ChatGPT. No one knows what to do with it.
Submitted 12 hours ago by Wurzl@lemmy.zip to mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/csu-openai-chatgpt-22397319.php
Comments
Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 hours ago
tal@lemmy.today 6 hours ago
The era when companies sent out physical floppies, which could actually be usefully reused if you didn’t care about the content on them, was a lot better than the physical CD era.
Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 hours ago
Would have been dope if all those AOL CDs could have been re-written. I’d have definitely used them for free storage.
huppakee@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
I guess better ChatGPT than that child undress app known as Grok.
fubarx@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Never understood.
-
“Kids, you’ll get penalized if you use AI for any of your school work. We have tools to check for that. That’s cheating.”
-
“Kids, here’s a free subscription to AI. Go nuts.”
-
altphoto@lemmy.today 8 hours ago
Cmon! Become dependent on a subscription to “thinking”. You can think more if you pay more!
richardisaguy@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Honesly, claude would have been a much better choice - at least it would be useful for the engineers.
Don’t let them benchmarks lie to you, chatGPT fumbles just about everything you trow at it.
cmbabul@slrpnk.net 9 hours ago
Of all the places “AI” absolutely does not belong, in the hands of university students and professors has to be close to the top of the list. What would a place that is supposed to be a center of human learning and founding critical thinking skills need with a product explicitly advertising its self as a shortcut to doing the work and “thinking critically” for you?
Butlerian jihad now please