Teale then received the first letter from the council, advising her the gorilla was not in keeping with the area and caused harm to the greenbelt.
A woman has been ordered to remove a gorilla statue from the front of her house in Wakefield or face a fine.
Submitted 1 week ago by Veserr@sh.itjust.works to unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr5pq37mmpvo
Comments
TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 1 week ago
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 week ago
If you think a 4 foot gorilla statue is bad, wait till you see what it’s scaring away…
CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 1 week ago
Austerity is slashing NHS but leaving these NIMBY enforcers employed.
MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
I saw one of those in a garden centre the other day, it was £500.
AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Oi luv! Let’s see your gorilla statue license!
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
Literally 1984. The statue isn’t harming anyone, it should be allowed to stay.
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 1 week ago
It might harm someone if it falls down. There is a reason building codes exist.
Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
They haven’t brought up any saftey concerns, simply ‘you didn’t ask first, so now it must come down’
Their initial letter about it only mentions aesthetic issues. Someone doesn’t like how it looks and is flexing their position to get it removed.
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
Then they have to prove its an unsuitable platform. Just as they would have to show that a tree is dangerous or blocking out the sun for neighbours if they were to try and require you to cut it down.
yakko@feddit.uk 1 week ago
There’s still a less combative way, I have to think. Require them to get a qualified builder to come round and make sure it’s sturdy and up to code. Hard not to see the present demand as just attacking nonconformity.
HarneyToker@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Imagine getting downvoted for being right.