Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Liberal election autopsy delayed after Dutton suggests report defamatory

⁨35⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Zagorath@aussie.zone⁩ to ⁨australianpolitics@aussie.zone⁩

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-18/peter-dutton-election-loss-liberal-party-report-delayed/106240876

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • kablez@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    As an Aussie, I’m grateful for everyday that the LNP is not back in government. Labor might be inadequate and sometimes infuriating, but they’re not outright evil bastards like the opposition.

    source
    • kingofras@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Luckily, just like with Obama II, people can’t see further than one term and don’t realise we should have been using the first term and all of this term to get rid of the 2 party system.

      Translation: Australia isn’t fucked right now, just delayed in getting fucked.

      source
      • Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        With outright majorities in the upper house as common as hens teeth, its pretty inarguable that we have something more complex than a two party system.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Taleya@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        We don’t HAVE a two party system

        source
  • Ilandar@lemmy.today ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Almost reads like a satirical headline lol

    source
    • No1@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I’m laughing even harder because it’s NOT a Betoota article!

      source
  • Mountaineer@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    For something to be defamatory it has to:
    a) Reduce the public’s perception of him (which is laughable, the public’s perception of him is “monster”)
    b) Be untrue (doubt it)

    I think he meant derogatory.
    And even that’s of questionable accuracy, as it’s about being shown an inappropriate amount of respect.

    source
    • Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I think he meant derogatory.

      He definitely meant defamatory, since he apparently tacitly threatened suing the Liberal Party. But whether it’s true or essentially a SLAPP threat is unclear.

      It’s certainly possible that he believes the report contained factually incorrect non-opinion claims about him. I can’t see that being likely though. I guess the fact that they didn’t give him the opportunity for a right-of-reply in the report can’t have helped. That would have given him an opportunity to address any potential issues before it got to this point. It really seems like a monumental fuck-up on their part not to have contacted him for right-of-reply.

      source
  • galoisghost@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    The fact that there is an actual “He is not a monster” headline. Quoting his own wife. Makes me wonder what’s in the report that he thinks a defamation proceeding would succeed.

    source
  • zero_gravitas@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    That bad, huh?

    source
  • Doorknob@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    If he tries to block it, it will leak, and that’ll make them look even worse again

    source
  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    A healthy and broadly educated population, which experiences safety and security, is incompatible with, and toxic to, conservative and authoritarian ideologies.

    source