a real danger of quantum computing

Comments

• peopleproblems@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I laughed. A physics & computer science joke? That was my degree. Well done

  source
• SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!

  source
• three@lemmy.zip ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  inb4 science nerds come to clarify what observing means

  source

  • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Ah, the classic question, “What do you mean by ‘measurement’?”

    source

    • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      0h sure everything looks that way when you quantify it

      source
  • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    IIRC it means firing a laser at the thing and measuring the reflected wavelengths.

    source

    • three@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      don’t care; didn’t ask

      source
• yucandu@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Did anyone check and see if the state of those quantum-linked pairs are related to time? And it’s just like a function of milliseconds since linking determines whether positive or negative, and that’s how you can know the other one is the exact opposite, without any “information being transmitted”… did anyone check if it’s time?

  source
• Thorry@feddit.org ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Skill issue

  source
• YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Tbf it’s just the wave function that collapsed, at that moment it’s more floating point computing.

  source