how do you secure it in your roof without damaging shingles?
THIS is an inventive idea
Submitted 1 day ago by Mickey7@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d82275ff-4079-4c4a-9b92-5b1c3e0b915f.png
Comments
orangeyouglad@lemmy.today 1 day ago
LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
safetyrailsource.com/products/nextgen-hitchclip
With just a little pre-planning when the weather is ok, you can install some brackets or fall harness mounts under the shingles.
Solar panel mounts would also work. There’s plenty of things designed to mount to the roof while still maintaining water proofing.
HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Maybe a series of ropes behind it that go over the peak and hook around a drainpipe?
4am@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Don’t hook anything to a vent stack and especially do not hook anything to an appliance exhaust. You are asking for problems.
Best way to do this is with a Christmas tree stand, secured with ropes over the top of the peak and off to the sides. Don’t penetrate the shingles.
aeronmelon@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Clark Griswald approved.
Ininewcrow@piefed.ca 1 day ago
Another added touch would be to park a big ugly motor home in the driveway
JelleWho@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Colin furze style youtu.be/zIJgDW09Lns
Stefan_S_from_H@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
About 6m.
ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
So that previously healthy tree, which took a decade or more to reach that height, gets to die for a gimmick.
LePoisson@lemmy.world 1 day ago
All Christmas trees get to die for a gimmick. What do you think the tree farms are for?
GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Actually here in germany it has been a thing forever to get a tree with roots and all. You water it a little while it is with you and then plant it again in the ground.
Obviously this doesnt work for really large trees, but still.
taiyang@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Bizarrely it’s probably more eco friendly than not having the tradition since those tree farms probably wouldn’t exist otherwise. It’s not like the meat industry, it’s probably net positive on emissions.
Though, it would be better if we just reduced urban sprawl and deforestation of natural forests, etc., but that’s how it goes I guess.
ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Yeah, fair point. I guess the “before” pic looked enough like a forest that this just really bummed me out.
infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
I feel like that makes the problem seem much worse, and not better?