Accessibility is important

Comments

• marius@feddit.org ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  And then the pictures look lile this

  1000014062

  source

  • kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    this is a good picture!

    source
  • tdawg@lemmy.world ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    This is suprisingly legible

    source
  • mmmac@lemmy.zip ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Nice I like this

    source
• Rudee@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Calm down, sir. π≠3 is just a suggestion

  source
• lorty@lemmy.ml ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Yes, please show me those 4d curves

  source
• spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I don’t feel that removing the “of Spiderman” was necessary here

  source
• jaybone@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Illiterate != inaccessible

  Also pictures are more difficult to translate into braille or large text. So a picture actually makes this less accessible.

  source

  • hypna@lemmy.world ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Unless text is removed to add the picture, nobody loses anything by adding additional tools that help some people.

    source
  • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I heavily disagree. As a visual learner I need pictures. Everything is visual to me, even math, language, programming… if you give me a wall of text using abstract terms I won’t understand shit. I require graphs, visual representations, mindmaps, something.

    It might not be the optimal medium for everyone (there is no universally accessible medium for anything!), but to argue that pictures make things less accessible is just plain wrong.

    source
• someacnt@sh.itjust.works ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  World category theoretical diagram suffice?

  www.researchgate.net/…/Commutative-diagram.png

  source
• OpenStars@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  People will just use AI to summarize (after which they will pretend to understand, just like they would do to a picture).

  source