Submitted 2 days ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to technology@lemmy.zip
In response to a question about how AI works with today’s legal system, Altman said one of the problems of not yet having a legal or policy framework for AI is that there’s no legal confidentiality for users’ conversations.
The saddest thought I can think of is telling your emotional problems to a high speed calculator
I know, I really don’t understand why people would take advice from a mechanical parrot. You’re better off throwing chicken bones or interpreting the flight patterns of crows.
There’s no confidentiality nor accountability for the generated words.
It’s a fucking toaster. You put words in, press a button you get toast out.
That’s pointing us into one conclusion, people don’t like silence.
I’m trying to make Ollama more accessible so I can replace Chatgpt.
I realized how much info I’ve been pushing to Chatgpt and it feels like 10000x more that what I’ve exposed to Google or Instagram. I share with Chatgpt all my wildest secret project ideas and I don’t want Chatgpt to have that anymore. I hope deleting my account will actually delete my chats but I know for a fact that that’s a dream.
AI training can steal whatever copyrighted property it wants. AI is not subject to any laws. It’s AI, fuck you, use it.
I’ve been starting to wonder just how much this shit “phones home”. Because, obviously, this technology can be used to increase the capabilities of corporate surveillance.
Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Bet you million bucks though, he still wants you to keep using it for your therapy. He wants you to feed as much data as possible about yourself. That data is worth billions.