it seems a bit disingenuous to call these “data centers in space”
30 terabytes of storage across 12 satellites? So 2.5 TB each and 744 tops (which is like, a modern mid range graphics card for a PC). Like that just sound like they’re launching a gaming PC in to orbit, not a datacenter.
The idea of processing more data on the satellite rather than processing it on the ground is interesting and neat, but representing these as anything more than that is… weird.
AcesFullOfKings@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
JillyB@beehaw.org 3 weeks ago
I would imagine some sort of heat pump is being used to transfer the heat from the electronics to the radiators.
huquad@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Fun fact, this isn’t all that effective because of the compressor heat/inefficiency. You get some benefit, but you also introduce moving parts and complexity.
Midnitte@beehaw.org 3 weeks ago
Seems like ocean supercomputers would be more viable…
megopie@beehaw.org 3 weeks ago
These are likely only using a few kilowatts, calling them data centers or super computers is an absurd hyperbole.
TauZero@mander.xyz 3 weeks ago
If you have a megawatt solar array, you can also afford a megawatt cooling array. The size is comparable.