I thought this was going to be unviabl because cooling megawatts of power passively by radiation is hard? That’s been overcome somehow then? The article just says “Orbital data centres can use solar power and radiate their heat to space”.
I did wonder in the past about using a large heat pump to make the heat fins much hotter, which should accelerate cooling. But just an armchair thought. Any info on how this is/will be cooled?
megopie@beehaw.org 1 day ago
it seems a bit disingenuous to call these “data centers in space”
30 terabytes of storage across 12 satellites? So 2.5 TB each and 744 tops (which is like, a modern mid range graphics card for a PC). Like that just sound like they’re launching a gaming PC in to orbit, not a datacenter.
The idea of processing more data on the satellite rather than processing it on the ground is interesting and neat, but representing these as anything more than that is… weird.
xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
due to cosmic radiation, computers in space run in triplicates…. so everything is times 3….
but yes, it’s a lie.
also, the definition of supercomputer is a bit muddy. my phone is a supercomputer by most standards (obsolete standards).
Comment105@lemm.ee 13 hours ago
So the journalist Wes Davis is a liar and the Verge is a slop factory run by idiots.
megopie@beehaw.org 1 day ago
Judging by the fact these are launching on long march 20s. It’s probably not going beyond LEO, so it doesn’t need proper deep space hardening like the RAD750 or the like.
It’s probably closer to off the shelf parts like what’s used on the ISS.
GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
12 of 2800 planned have been launched.
TehPers@beehaw.org 1 day ago
I have a server at home built from old parts and some refurbished drives with nearly that much storage. 2800 satellites like this would come out to around 230 of my servers, or ~7PB.
A single 2U server with 12 drives, each with 24TB storage, can hold 288TB. It would take ~24 of those to get to 7PB, which is a lot of servers, but not so many that someone with quite a lot of savings couldn’t afford it.
Also, the servers on the ground can be cooled by, idk, air if needed. Or water. Or I guess liquid nitrogen if you want. Point is there’s an atmosphere for the heat to dissipate to, unlike space.
megopie@beehaw.org 1 day ago
That’s still not very much compared to most data centers. Like, 7000 terabytes is a lot of storage for one person, but it barely even registers compared to most modern data centers.
Also, 7000 desktops networked together isn’t really a super computer or a data center.
such a network is interesting as a scientific tool for gathering and processing data, certainly, but not a data-center and not a super computer.