For reference
Submitted 3 weeks ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/61c7e4ee-9b19-41bb-86b6-937589452f5b.jpeg
Comments
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 weeks ago
How do I know it’s not two halves of the same fig?
tabris@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Yeah, it should be “fig 1”, “also fig 1, but the other half”.
zarqie@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
fig 0.5 and fig 1.0
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
The shape and internal structure are different.
TachyonTele@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
Because… Science!
BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
I have a justified true belief that aren’t the same fig
TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Does this mean that everything else labeled as fig has been a lie?
Klear@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Not a lie per se, more of a fib.
dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Hrmf, figures.
Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Banana for scale?
JayJay@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Damn, black and white figs look like demons. The paradolia is real.
BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
They’re both fig 1
MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Damn you.
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Are these sig figs, or just the regular type?
HylicManoeuvre@mander.xyz 3 weeks ago
Ceci n’est pas une figue.
muhyb@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
Image