Are these sig figs, or just the regular type?
For reference
Submitted 2 days ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/61c7e4ee-9b19-41bb-86b6-937589452f5b.jpeg
Comments
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 6 hours ago
muhyb@programming.dev 2 days ago
henfredemars@infosec.pub 2 days ago
How do I know it’s not two halves of the same fig?
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
The shape and internal structure are different.
tabris@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yeah, it should be “fig 1”, “also fig 1, but the other half”.
BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
I have a justified true belief that aren’t the same fig
TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 days ago
Because… Science!
TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Does this mean that everything else labeled as fig has been a lie?
Klear@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Not a lie per se, more of a fib.
dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Hrmf, figures.
Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Banana for scale?
JayJay@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Damn, black and white figs look like demons. The paradolia is real.
MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Damn you.
BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
They’re both fig 1