KUNG FURY 2 Trailer + Sizzle Reel [10:49]

Comments

• ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Is it… Is it supposed to spoil so much?

  source

  • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    nope. It’s made for internal promotion.

    The movie itself is basically finished, but is in legal limbo for the last 5 years

    variety.com/…/kung-fury-2-insane-10-minute-sizzle…

    This was an internal promo video that was never supposed to be seen by the public. I feel bad because it contains a bunch of plot points and temp VFX,” Sandberg told Variety in a statement. “I hope at least people can see the passion that we poured into the movie, the world deserves to see it as it was meant to be seen. This movie has been held hostage for the past 5 years but I promise to keep fighting for it and make sure this film gets the chance it truly deserves.

    source

    • deathmetal27@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Does anyone know what exactly is the legal issue with the film?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      legal limbo is the dumbest shit, it’s just a company who refuses to make a small amount of money and would rather make $0 lol

      source
    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Damn, that sucks :(

      source
  • anguo@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Image

    source
• simple@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  More discussion in the movies community: feddit.uk/post/28997897

  I hope it comes out eventually. The sizzle reel looks fantastic.

  source
• Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I wonder if this leak is like when Deadpool’s sizzle promo “leaked.”

  source
• Kolanaki@pawb.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  It’s finally happening 😃

  source

  • AlexisFR@jlai.lu ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Nah, it still is not.

    source
  • TehBamski@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Image

    source
• MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Yeah. Thats my bicep…

  Amazing movie. (Now im going to get to bed late after rewatching the first one again…)

  source