I know batman isn’t the most realistic thing out there, but wtf was this shit?
Privacy: Breached
Submitted 10 months ago by ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5cfca987-7590-46b4-804b-7a1466aa72e2.png
Comments
Bezier@suppo.fi 10 months ago
xpinchx@lemmy.world 10 months ago
It was a social commentary on the Patriot act, BatMan turned the whole population’s cell phones into surveillance devices to map out Gotham and find {villain} I can’t remember which at this point.
Alfred was like “this is wrong” and I think he peaces out and said “batman ur a dick” and Batman did it anyway. It’s been a while since I saw this movie but I think that sums it up nicely.
Takumidesh@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Media literacy goes brrrrrr
loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
With this many screens, I can watch all the Yu-Gi-Oh.
ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Depiction of burger king
TachyonTele@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Like a Subway, Mr Wayne. Like a Subway.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
It’s 5G maaaaaaan
JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 10 months ago
Spotify has partnered with a company essentially trying to do this exact thing apparently
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Not as farfetched as you might think. I literally have to watch what I say and where I go that might be playing a loud enough audio program, because all of it gets me relevant advertisements almost word for word on the subjects my phone has been in the vicinity of. Has happened way too often to be coincidence.
ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 10 months ago
The funny thing is that the industry seems to float an even worse explanation than them actively listening: they already know what you’re going to be interested in based on usage patterns, and can figure out that you’ll be talking about those things approximately when you’re doing so. As such they show ads.
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Not entirely true for me simply because of media saturation. For instance there is more sports programming on air and online of which I have no interest in yet the news aggregators that I read often are flooded with the stuff despite my consistent attempts at removing it from my feeda
Donjuanme@lemmy.world 10 months ago
If they were tracking what I was buying from the company I wouldn’t give a rats ass, in fact I’m quite sure that information is readily available to them.
I’m not a privacy nut, I’m usually poking fun at privacy first people, but I don’t put any app on my phone that I didn’t pay for, or that doesn’t have code I can’t understand (I can’t understand code at all, but there’s a “flashlight widget 'app '” that’s like 50 lines long.
Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 10 months ago
To many people, not putting an app that you cant see the code of is being a privacy nut.
ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I’m the kind of guy who’d let McDonalds read my emails if it have me a free burger.
Turret3857@infosec.pub 10 months ago
I’m the kind of person to have the McDonalds app in its own isolated profile with its own email and deny it location information because the guvermint can still just ask McDonalds to read those emails you decided to let them read in exchange for tax cuts.
OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
You realize they don’t just read the data they collect right? They make money by selling that data. They sell it to anyone who pays them, even your guvermint.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Its spelt gubermint
nesc@lemmy.cafe 10 months ago
So givining it guberment trough proxy is ok? /s
chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I worked at a place that used customer phone numbers for internal market research in a less-scummy way.
For instance, if the same customers (tracked by their phone number) purchased lots of X and Z, but not Y, we’d market X and Z together.