Hierarchy must justify its existence, or it must be dismantled.
What is the central tenet(s) of political anarchism? What makes a political philosophy anarchism vs something else?
Submitted 3 weeks ago by lousyd@lemmy.sdf.org to [deleted]
Comments
Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Apytele@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
I like this definition. It makes sense to have one or a small selection of elected officials to make decisions that need to be made quickly or that it’s difficult to come to a complete consensus on. But if those requirements aren’t met its very likely a decision made by public consensus.
Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
One thing to point out: it doesn’t say “elected”.
In theory it might be just the best leading person for a role.
That in itself is the most complex issue in my opinion: where do leaders come from and how do you make sure that they don’t overstay their need? It’s an unresolved issue and democracy is our best answer yet, in my opinion.
KombatWombat@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
But that’s just a pithy statement that someone of any political position would likely agree with. Everyone wants their government to be efficient. What does justification mean to anarchist specifically?
Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Nope. You’re wrong.
EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Political anarchism is a lie. Anarchism isn’t political. Anarchy is life. It’s fair.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
I have recently started reading “Anarchism and other Essays” by Emma Goldman, and it’s very enlightening about what the ideology actually means.
I highly recommend checking her out. Also, I believe Kropotkin is considered some sort of anarchist, and I would also recommend reading his book, “The Conquest of Bread”. I’ve found Kropotkin to be a great writer, and his stuff is pretty compelling rather than dry (which this stuff can be).
bear@lemmynsfw.com 3 weeks ago
Politically they want smaller and more local government. There are anarchists on the right who want freer markets and anarchists on the left who want stronger unions.
lousyd@lemmy.sdf.org 3 weeks ago
Anarchists want government?
agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
You can’t handle the logistics of a modern civilization without some kind of administration. Someone has to collect, advocate, and distribute resources to the various public services necessary for a functioning society.
There are “anarcho-capitalists” who might claim to want to dismantle all government in favor of totally unregulated capitalism, but that’s just trading out elected officials for the private boards of massive companies. Else they temper that private power with “citizen advocacy boards” which, after a long enough conversation with an an-cap willing to earnestly answer questions, eventually develop into something indistinguishable from government.
Government is necessary, anarchists want government without oppressive hierarchies. I say oppressive, because organizational hierarchies are really the only way to quickly and efficiently handle large projects. The problem arises with authoritarian hierarchies, when the scope of hierarchical power expands from clerical to tyrannical.
A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
“Government” is a very vague term.
Anarchists are opposed to rulers, not rules. We want to be able to establish our own rules directly. The form of social organization depends largely on the anarchist you’re talking to, but most of us support some variation on federated communes utilizing direct democracy and delegates, not representatives.
Honestly, just read The Conquest of Bread by Petr Kropotkin. It’s available free at thebreadbook.org
bear@lemmynsfw.com 3 weeks ago
They want changes to the government. It’s like I said bro wants fewer oranges and you said bro wants oranges?
Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
No they do not want government. If you want a more accurate description of anarchism ask this on the anarchist community.
Fleur_@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
So far the only things I’ve seen anarchists do is be anti establishment, make vague comments about removing hierarchy and refuse to elaborate. Generally I think it’s pretty broad term non-specific enough in common language to apply to many things but people in anarchist communities all tend to have their own specific ideas and definitions of anarchy. Which I suppose makes sense given the term in question.
lousyd@lemmy.sdf.org 3 weeks ago
Yeah, by posting here I was hoping someone would elaborate on the hierarchy part, in particular.
A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Opposition to hierarchy.
From Greek for without rulers. Anarchism is rooted in opposition to forms of domination and coercion; historically, its three main opponents have been thee Church, the State, and capitalism. The main Western tradition of anarchism dates back to the advent of socialism, although there have been many anarchic societies and philosophers the world over for pretty much as long as people have existed.
There are lots of forms of anarchism, generally relating to either different visions of an ideal horizontal social structure, or just boiling down to what that particular activist focuses on (anarcho-feminists are mostly concerned with patriarchy, for instance). Mostly, anarchists aren’t prescriptivist - as long as people are trying to take power into their own lives, anarchists are for it.
lousyd@lemmy.sdf.org 3 weeks ago
What counts as hierarchy? Like, if I pay a plumber to fix my plumbing problems because I don’t know how to, does that imply some hierarchy between us?
A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
No, because the plumber doesn’t have power over you.
Your boss has power over you - he can decide to remove your source of income, and uses that as leverage to get you to do what he wants.
Your government has power over you - they have a monopoly on the use of violence and use it to maintain control.
Your preacher has power over you - by making you afraid for your soul, he can manipulate you unwillingly, or severely impact your social status.
Your plumber is someone providing a service, that’s completely different.
Cattypat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
exchange AFAIK isn’t considered hierarchy, a trade of goods (in your example money for service) is equal