Need designated cycle lanes. Anything else is not a solution. Unless we remover the driver completely with self driving cars. Please waymo! You’re my only hope.
Cyclists are dying on our roads at an alarming rate - why don't we care?
Submitted 1 year ago by mondoman712@lemmy.ml to unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/news-opinion/cyclists-dying-roads-alarming-rate-29528316
Comments
Wanderer@lemm.ee 1 year ago
echodot@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Self-Driving car technology is decades away from being viable so I wouldn’t pin my hopes on that one.
Wanderer@lemm.ee 1 year ago
It’s currently open to anyone in San Francisco
OrlandoDoom@feddit.uk 1 year ago
I nearly got hit 2 days ago by someone who was only looking right as they were turning right out of a junction, he sped off after too, knew he fucked up.
DakRalter@thelemmy.club 1 year ago
The amount of times I’ve had bus drivers not able to wait 2 seconds for me to pass the bus stop, and then pull in, almost pushing me into the kerb. I really need to get a helmet cam. Black cab drivers can be bad offenders too.
echodot@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Being a driving professional seems to require you to be a dangerous driver I’ve noticed.
sirico@feddit.uk 1 year ago
We’re just cyclists basically asking for it right?
byroon@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Same cause as a lot of problems: the UK has an incredibly right-wing press (mostly owned by a few billionaires) that pumps out propaganda all the time
mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 year ago
The press seems to be very powerful to have this much coercive control. What media outlets would you like to be shut down?
HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Not OP.
But the UK press has had this power since at least the early 1800s. When they were directly responsible for delaying the UK abolition of slavery. By outright lying to the UK population about the life of slaves.
Access to the internet has definitely reduced the influence in the last 20 years. But the same spending is effecting social media.
The daily mail has the worst reputation. Given, it was set up intentionally by a wealthy Mongol in the 1930s to influence commoner ideals. (commoner being the political term at the time, House of Lords vs commons). But the UK freedom of the press ideal truly distorts how wealth can be used to influence UK press.
FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 1 year ago
Just the criminal ones. I think that would leave private eye
wewbull@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Whoa there!!! Who mentioned shutting down portions of the press because they don’t say what you want?