Sub Sampling

Comments

• fossphi@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  We’ve been through some rough times [4-7]

  What the heck would those citations be‽

  source

  • Isoprenoid@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Later in the article he mentions that [7] was a study of her mood swings.

    source
  • Ooops@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    [4] Broman, Chad 2015 Why is Valentine’s Day so Important? A Time Analysis of Tiffany’s Relationship Expectations :: Journal of Psychological Machine Learning [5] Broman, Chad 2016 A Play by Play Analysis of Purchasing a Luxury Speedboat during an out of Wedlock Pregnancy Scare :: Journal of Psychological Machine Learning [6] Broman, Chad 2016 The Mood Metric Equivalent Measurement: How to Get Away with a 150$ Bar Tab :: Journal of Psychological Machine Learning [7] Broman, Chad 2021 A Time Series Analysis of My Girlfriend’s Mood Swings :: Journal of Astrological Big Data Ecology

    source

    • fossphi@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Chad Broman

      source
• idiomaddict@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Is there more? I kind of want to know more

  source

  • voicesarefree@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    jabde.com/…/sub-nyquist-sampling-of-girlfriend

    source

    • idiomaddict@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      As discovered from [4], she will not continue to love me if I do not share an equal love for the workplace based drama.

      My favorite line

      source
    • haerrii@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Thanks for letting me find that hilarious journal

      source
• henfredemars@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I legit would love to discuss sub-Nyquist sampling. I worked in the field for a few years.

  source

  • moistclump@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Can you eli5 nyquist?

    source

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      The Nyquist theorem, in very simple terms, describes the minimum measurements you need to take to capture all the information in a signal. It turns out, if you have special information about what signal you expect to see, you can still figure it out using fewer measurements.

      Generally speaking, it tells you how many measurements you need to take to capture the whole signal.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • Artyom@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Instead of actually explaining it, here’s how I like to remember it: If you are measuring something that produces a perfect sine wave, and you can’t take measurements faster than 30 Hz, then you can’t definitively prove that the sine wave repeats faster than that. No matter how many data points you collect, the actual frequency could always be double what your measurements suggest.

      source
• ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  This is so deliciously nerdy

  source
• BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  this is hilarious!! 😂😂

  source
• flora_explora@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Wtf? If your girlfriend is annoying you by just talking then why don’t you break up? This whole thing screams sexist tropes about women! Don’t care if some of it is funny play on scientific terms but the underlying assumptions of gender roles are disgusting…

  source

  • OrnateLuna@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Yeah was rather hard to see past the generic sexism

    source
• SendMePhotos@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Try to*

  Get peer reviewed/edited, nerd!

  source

  • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Very well put together but Image

    source