Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

nice for a holiday, i presume.

⁨336⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨fossilesque@mander.xyz⁩ to ⁨science_memes@mander.xyz⁩

https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/c5423255-344e-42cf-b355-50258264aaff.webp

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    To be fair, isn’t that also how this one earth like planet called “Earth” used to look like?

    source
    • slazer2au@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      still does in some places.

      also doesn’t earth-like mean atmosphere and in the Goldilocks zone?

      source
    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      But not for long in a sense, right?

      source
      • Yondoza@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        The hadrean period (lava earth) was approximately as long as there have been vertebrates. So pretty long!

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Neato@ttrpg.network ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        For about half a billion years Earth was mostly molten on the surface. So about 11% of the time. And then we’ve had major glaciation periods especially the cryongenian that lasted 78M years about 640M years ago.

        source
      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Eventually got different, but it did linger a while at both stages.

        source
  • daltotron@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    That’ll be earth-like in 50 years, just give it some time

    source
    • spittingimage@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Maybe a lil bit of compost at the edges to help it along.

      source
  • kralk@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Is there a reason why life HAS to evolve on an earth like planet? I guess it’s the most likely given our experience, but could life happen on Venus or something?

    source
    • xkforce@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      We only have one planet with life on it to go off and finding life is like looking for a needle in a haystack. So while other exotic forms of life may exist, it would be a lot harder to search for and recognize. And the conditions under which life on Earth exists are understood better so we can look for those range of conditions rather than aimlessly search every conceivable but less likely set of conditions. eg. liquid water. Life can survive two of the extremes of acidity, salinity (saltiness) and temperature but not all three (that we know of) and there has to be a chemical and/or energy disruption of equilibrium of the system. eg. CH4 in the presence of O2 etc. In the needle in a haystack analogy, we are using a magnet to sift through the haystack first because needles that we know of tend to be magnetic. If we dont find anything we might search for bone or ceramic needles using different search methods etc.

      source
    • GCanuck@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      From my understand (degree form YouTube), our understanding of what is needed for life is liquid water and free energy.

      Which means earth like is most likely, but there are other alternatives. For example, the moon of Jupiter (Titan iirc) is ice covered but has liquid water beneath the surface, and the gravity of Jupiter should provide the free energy so that’s the Vegas favourite for finding extraterrestrial life within our solar system.

      source
      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Water isn’t necessary (in theory)

        en.wikipedia.org/…/Hypothetical_types_of_biochemi…

        source
    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Not necessarily. It’s more that we know that life can occur on an earth-like planet, and everything else is speculation.

      source
  • A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    In part because we need better ways to measure the contents of the atmosphere of said planets, we basically can’t right now (but some gas giants), whenever we can, we may find life, or not, but it will be interesting.

    Spectroscopy, really interesting read.

    source