Me too, my sweet summer child

Comments

• cloudless@feddit.uk ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I have read the book and it is actually really cool.

  Not babies but children are often more open to unconventional ideas.

  source

  • Norgur@fedia.io ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Because "convention" is learned, not inherent

    source

    • Kolanaki@yiffit.net ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I guess if you’re taught that things can be in two places at once, can appear and disappear at random, and all sorts of other spooky weirdness, that would seem normal. Magic would lose a lot of charm, though.

      “So he made his assistant disappear. So what? She probably just teleported somewhere using quantum entanglement.”

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  The dad is laughing while pretending to have the slightest fucking clue about what the book says.

  source
• valveman@lemmy.eco.br ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  If the book title was “Kubernetes for Babies”, we’d probably get the same reaction

  source

  • Dragster39@feddit.de ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Full stack for babies shudders

    source
• Zerush@lemmy.ml ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  It’s never too early to prepare children for today’s life.

  Image

  source

  • nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    My brother in Jod, Bukowski isn’t even suitable for most grown ups

    source

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Can be complemented with

      Image

      source
• WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Does he want the baby to get shot by Will Smith?

  source
• iAvicenna@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I am wondering who is the originator of this dumbass idea of trying to teach babies and 1-2 year olds advanced science. It really plays well on the parents’ fantasies about their child being the most important person of the next century

  source