Comment on Anon sees happy people

• shneancy@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  “if i can’t have it, nobody should have it”

  also applies to everyone who opposes progress because they had it hard in life

  source

  • Comment105@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    That’s a lot of people. They’re a fucking problem.

    source

    • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Well I’ve had to deal with them my whole life, so you should too.

      source

      • Comment105@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        If I was in power we’d deal with them alright. Forced relocation to Bitterville, with a dictator hell bent on fixing nothing.

        source
  • tetris11@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I kinda get that. Its like trying to be happy for a billionaire who lives in a castle whilst you can barely afford rent.

    source

    • moriquende@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Except people having it easier due to progress comes at the cost of nobody, while billionaires having it good comes at great cost to everybody but them.

      source

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I’d argue that progress always comes at a cost to something, loss of jobs, rarer to mine minerals, loss in quality to meet demand, etc. But I hear ya

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • shneancy@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      this doesn’t really apply to billionaires, the same people who oppose things like student debt forgiveness will also lick billionaires’ boots and present them as the role models of the “american dream”

      it’s the bitter people who had it hard in life, and think new generations having it easier is something bad, it’s unfair, even though as a civilisation we should all strive to make life easier for those who come after us. but no “if i had it bad in life, you have to go through the same, or you’re not really [insert whatever group you feel like, man/woman/american/minority]”, as if struggle and suffering was a right of passage

      source