The pirate something guy was the only one I saw and he’s a fraud anyway
Beaver@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
And the corporate supporters told us the petition was pointless 🤡
tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Beaver@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
Guy had Pierre Poilierve energy. Acting like the free market is perfect and that corporations will never screw people over and that by holding them accountable games will become unprofitable to make and that would the end of the game industry /s
Voyajer@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Him, ThePrimeagen, and Theo Browne were the biggest ones I saw, with various levels of bad arguments.
hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Why is Pirate Software a fraud?
I appreciated his take on it. Don’t trust politicians to come up with a good solution, always present the issue when you have a good solution ready. And the solution proposed by that petition was weak at best and outright dangerous for the industry at worst.
If you want to force specificity on buying v getting limited time access, that’s fine, but that’s not what the petition focused on.
If you wanna force devs to plan ahead with huge infrastructure cost to make sure servers will be online for a specific time, this might result in online games being unjustifiable for smaller studios.
If you want to shield independent people hosting unofficial servers to games, now that’s a different conversation that we first need to have to figure it out, before proposing an exact solution through a petition.
And I really don’t think stop killing games is clear on those, and that makes this endeavor a lottery with the entire multiplayer games industry in limbo.
Give me another more precise initiative and I’ll join, but until then I’ll definitely not sign anything. If we change things, we should change them for the better, so let’s do our due diligence first.
tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I do literally not care how a policy would damage a company. I am playing the games, not developing them. If a company shuts down servers, they can at least provide players with the server binaries (difficult in the case of MMOs etc, but still better than doing nothing).
The EU can suck, but sometimes they put some pretty neat policies in place to protect consumers (e.g. the difference in USA vs EU MS Windows), so I trust them to hold publishers responsible to not cut off access to a sold product. Let’s say the EU prohibits putting Gacha mechanics in games, would you defend companies then, claiming the EU is cutting their profits (sorry, kinda strawmannish, but it feels to me this way)?
About pirate software (finally looked him up): He just seemed annoying as hell and every time YouTube pushed a short of him it was just ramblings in which huge parts were just untrue. Idk if he even codes, I only see him rambling about some shit with the voice you make when you are 14 and want to sound deeper. People on YouTube said he is a nepo baby but I don’t care too much about him to go down that rabbithole.
ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
Idk if he even codes
He was a hacker for the US government and has won 3 competitions at DEFCON. Before that he was a programmer for Blizzard and Amazon Games.
absquatulate@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Sadly I doubt this was thanks to the petition itself. More likely ubi is trying to claw back some goodwill ( and make some cash too, by promoting the title that was full of mtx instead of the retired one ). They’ve also done this offline fix thing in the past ( with anno 2070 for one ) and also after a healthy dose of player backlash.
ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 week ago
They’re not listening to consumers. Consumers are not complaining to the corporations, they’re complaining to the government. They’re only doing anything because the writing is clearly on the wall and passing new legislation will make shit way worse for them so they’re being proactive.
ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
They’re doing this because they’ve lost so much money investors are angry and the executives want to win people back. They aren’t worried about law changes, they’re worried about their stock price and reputation.
In the 12 years since European Citizens Initiatives have existed, there have been few successful campaigns even fewer actual law changes. If I were a greedy company, I wouldn’t be worried about this in the slightest.
If ECIs are to become a useful tool for civil society, campaigners would benefit from a better understanding of how to craft their demands in a way that is likely to lead the Commission to actually propose a legislative initiative. There have now been 133 ECI attempts, millions of signatures collected, a significant amount of money spent, and little to show for it.
helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 week ago
They’re doing this because they’ve lost so much money investors are angry
There are a dozen reasons in this article why they’re losing money and none of them are because they’re removing games.
tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world 1 week ago
G*mers will lap up so much slop and malicious decisions publishers push out, we DO need governments to regulate.
The few (big) publishers that listen to consumers can be counted on one hand.
Katana314@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Downvoted for censoring Gamers. I will always downvote people using that stupid fucking asterisk. Don’t be a child.
tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Cry
JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 1 week ago
This was literally the threat of government intervention
penquin@lemm.ee 1 week ago
Never listen to those fucking asses.