Besides the first all electric train bit, which is nonsense, it also touts the capacity of the train. It has 120 seats, which may be mind blowing to car heads, but for a train is rather on the low side. Regular passenger trains often have over 200 seats and many have more seats for the same length. For busy pieces of track 600 seats per train aren’t unusual.
It really is like the author has never heard of trains before and has his mind blown by the concept.
Personally I think putting in batteries is kinda dumb, trains need so much infrastructure already and it’s fixed in location. Adding a power delivery system (like overhead power lines like most electric trains have) is really easy. That way a lot of weight is saved, thus making the whole thing more efficient. You also don’t need any special materials to make it, compared with huge batteries. And the wear components are a lot less expensive to replace.
Fermion@feddit.nl 2 months ago
The title says worlds first all-electric train rather than worlds first all-battery-powered train. There have been many all-electric trains before. So the title as written is incorrect.
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 2 months ago
Electric trains actually predate diesel, noted as far back as the 30s. Subways kind of needed something that didn’t emit smoke and fumes
oo1@lemmings.world 2 months ago
Volk’s electric railway, 1883. Only a narrow gague tourist type thing but still technically a passenger railway.
Letstakealook@lemm.ee 2 months ago
That’s a good point, fair enough.