Even though this is true for like 90% of my thinking (that I can see when I try), so far I’m concinced this ist because I am a predominantly language-and-normal-grammar-rules thinker.
There are people that mostly think via associations of words that don’t have to be formulated/ cast into grammar.
And then there supposedly people mainly thinking in pictures or smth, without words.
Anyways for some people rubber duck mode reoresents a change in thinking method, I think
HamsterRage@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
I think it’s a bit more than that. I think that the idea is that you simplify the problem so that the rubber duck could understand it. Or at least reformulate it in order to communicate it clearly.
It’s the simplification, reformulation or reorganisation that helps to get the breakthrough.
Just thinking out loud isn’t quite the same thing.
snooggums@midwest.social 3 months ago
The small but important differences are what makes it another flavor.
HamsterRage@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
You mean “flavour”, right? Another small but important difference.
snooggums@midwest.social 3 months ago
As far as I am aware it is a regional difference in spelling, and that is what I get when searching for definitions.
What small but importance difference are you referring to?
superkret@feddit.org 3 months ago
Explain why “flavor” is wrong, as if I was a rubber duck. You can use any help you like, including a dictionary.
brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Flavour Flauvvvvv
Emerald@lemmy.world 3 months ago
When your legs don’t work like they used to before
And I can’t sweep you off of your feet