kwomp2

@kwomp2@sh.itjust.works

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The mark⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Nah but a fresh tick bite. This means I’m from the future

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How Do You Explain to a Fully Grown Adult That Constantly Mocking Others' Appearance (Even on TV) is Toxic Behavior?⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Whats going on ITT?

  You fluffin find out where that insecurity comes from and help them build themselves up.

  Constructive and empathic (self)critique is how transformation works

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How Do You Explain to a Fully Grown Adult That Constantly Mocking Others' Appearance (Even on TV) is Toxic Behavior?⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  This is not how you strenghthen solidarity. In case anyone ever gave you warmth when you were struggling to be a nice person: ponder that situation :)

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨New tech discovered⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Even though this is true for like 90% of my thinking (that I can see when I try), so far I’m concinced this ist because I am a predominantly language-and-normal-grammar-rules thinker.

  There are people that mostly think via associations of words that don’t have to be formulated/ cast into grammar.

  And then there supposedly people mainly thinking in pictures or smth, without words.

  Anyways for some people rubber duck mode reoresents a change in thinking method, I think

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Put em up⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  So trying to destroy it and making sure its accurate and complete turns out to be the same thing

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨What the fuck⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Damn that hell of a good explanation, thank god I can use those holy words in the future with their whole blasphemic potential. Ironically, it will prolly make me sound like a christian…

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨What the fuck⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  That makes sense. Your doc wouldn’t try to convince your shit explains the universe tho

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨What the fuck⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I never understood how “hell” and “damn” are considered forbidden words by christian-conservatives. The stem directly from their own vocabulary, they are all about those categories, yet they don’t want to see them in discourse

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The stats don't lie⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Someone discovered the dialectic of individual and society

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Elsevier⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Thank you, this justifies to introduce myself as campaign porn producer from now on

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Elsevier⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  (What I’m trying to say is you have my bow)

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Elsevier⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Succesfully iniating this from the fediverse would be such a massive boost in public visibility and discoursive strength of the project of collectivization of information infrastructure (like lemmy).

  Imagine we fluffin freed science from capital and basically all the scientists openly stated how useful this was

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Fossils⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Okay I dont know much about dino categorization, but let’s say: The category “dinosaur” is a sum of descriptions of objective properties of dinosaurs and their relation to other species’ properties (idk, no milk, thus no mammal…). Those properties and relations existed as the dinosaur existed. So I would agree: to that extend the categories existed, without us.

  Let’s say the category “poetry” describes a relational phenomenon that occurs when a combination of words or an arrangement of things (sunset, fossils) sparks an aesthetic experience.

  This is not just discovered and described by humans, but it can exclusively happen when humans are present. As with dinos: the category “poetry” didn’ exist before us. The difference I’m all about: What the category describes also did’t exist before humans. Yes, there were fossils, but they alone would have never evolved to be a part of poetry without humans, the way dinos were dinos without humans.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Community⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  You also rock.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Community⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  You rock.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Fossils⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  To the haters: I dont question your experience of (this) poetry. That I would be sorry for.

  I questions the hypostasis, that is declaring your experience of the thing as a property of the thing.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Fossils⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  No. By my logic human existence is the point in wich poetry exists.

  Yes, we almost agree, I just argue: Poetry is not what sparks. It’s the spark.

  Sunrise exists: no poetry. Sunrise sparks someones mind: poetry.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Community⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Did anyone look this up?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Fossils⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Yeah nice, but also no not quite… Before humans and before words there was no poetry. Just stones and bugs and stuff. It needed humans cognitive capacity to emerge/create (not discover) aesthetic categories, like poetry

  Sorry for fact checking your poetic meme, but it made this claim that might be understood factual and unreflected mystification of nature is still quite a thing

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨ripperonis⁩ ⁨⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Wasn’t sure if you were joking. But after 3 minutes of research I see you weren’t. Thanks for that info. … turns out they don’t euphemize their euthanize.

  I’ll see myself out

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Social media⁩ ⁨⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Random wrong place I know, but dont wanna bother more people then necessary: Why cant i see upvotes/downvotes?