ah right, thanks
Comment on Every base is base 10
chellomere@lemmy.world 5 months agoNo, 12 in base 12 is 10, not C. But yes, 10 can be A and 11 can be B
problematicPanther@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Comment on Every base is base 10
chellomere@lemmy.world 5 months agoNo, 12 in base 12 is 10, not C. But yes, 10 can be A and 11 can be B
ah right, thanks
drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 5 months ago
Dude’s out here trying to get us to use base 13.
marcos@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Why not?
Why not use a large prime as the base?
drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 5 months ago
Honnest answer, 1/2 in DEC is 0.5 easy. 1/2 in base 13 is .6666666666… Easy but ugly. You want a base that has comon fractions easily represented by decimals. People like dozenal since many fractions are easily represented. 1/2 = 0.6, 1/3 = 0.4, 1/4 = 0.3
I’m personally a fan of hexidecimal partly because I’m a programmer and partially because it can be halved several times
unreasonabro@lemmy.world 5 months ago
it’s almost like you’d have to use a different notation system to express a different base…
bisby@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Is 1/2 in base 13 not 0.65?
SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Ahh yes, let’s introduce floating point rounding errors for one half. Sounds fun.
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 months ago
Lets use base Pi and put an end to that infinite digit bullshit.
whotookkarl@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Why use a fixed base? Or why not use an irrational number like e, the most efficient base
marcos@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I still think some largish prime, like 37 hits the perfect spot of being usable enough for people to use, but still useless enough to stop almost everybody from learning any advanced math.
But yeah, making integrals non-representable is a serious trade-off that deserves consideration.