Sure, but that is measuring calorie content, not what your body can absorb
Comment on Making healthier choices
joyjoy@lemm.ee 5 months agoThe only way to get an accurate reading on calorie count is to burn it. 1 kilocalorie (nutritional calorie) can increase the temperature of 1kg of water by 1 C°
gibmiser@lemmy.world 5 months ago
eatCasserole@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Exactly, which makes the whole endeavour more of a guessing game than a science.
Mongostein@lemmy.ca 5 months ago
I think using trial and error to see what works for your body is a pretty scientific approach
ramble81@lemm.ee 5 months ago
I mean there’s no way that they’re gonna be able to do metrics for every person since every person is built differently so there has to be a common standard. Or you you saying that certain types of calories are burned the same way for all people?
gibmiser@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I’m just saying it’s not that simple.
janNatan@lemmy.ml 5 months ago
But burning isn’t how your body utilizes the calories. Some things burn just fine yet are entirely useless as a (human) food source, like wood. This complicates things.
For instance, we still don’t know if our bodies can actually use ethanol (drinking alcohol) as a fuel source. Is that vodka shot adding to your daily calorie intake?
giantfloppycock@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Vodka’s back on the menu, boys!
TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 5 months ago
It was off the menu?
StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Even more reason there is plenty of science to be discovered. Until then, the rough estimate we have is still proven to work (calories consumed minus calories burned).