Sure, but that is measuring calorie content, not what your body can absorb
Comment on Making healthier choices
joyjoy@lemm.ee 10 months agoThe only way to get an accurate reading on calorie count is to burn it. 1 kilocalorie (nutritional calorie) can increase the temperature of 1kg of water by 1 C°
gibmiser@lemmy.world 10 months ago
eatCasserole@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Exactly, which makes the whole endeavour more of a guessing game than a science.
Mongostein@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
I think using trial and error to see what works for your body is a pretty scientific approach
ramble81@lemm.ee 10 months ago
I mean there’s no way that they’re gonna be able to do metrics for every person since every person is built differently so there has to be a common standard. Or you you saying that certain types of calories are burned the same way for all people?
gibmiser@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I’m just saying it’s not that simple.
janNatan@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
But burning isn’t how your body utilizes the calories. Some things burn just fine yet are entirely useless as a (human) food source, like wood. This complicates things.
For instance, we still don’t know if our bodies can actually use ethanol (drinking alcohol) as a fuel source. Is that vodka shot adding to your daily calorie intake?
giantfloppycock@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Vodka’s back on the menu, boys!
TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 10 months ago
It was off the menu?
StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Even more reason there is plenty of science to be discovered. Until then, the rough estimate we have is still proven to work (calories consumed minus calories burned).