Comment on Just 2 people.

asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  If every church houses two homeless people, no more homeless people.

  source

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Assuming the distribution is the same for both

    source

    • huginn@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      (it’s not)

      But the point is not invalid. It’s a problem that seems insurmountable but can definitely be tackled.

      source

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Although homeless people absolutely can and do migrate. They prefer cities for somewhat similar reasons to everyone else, and with no place they are allowed to live why not go for somewhere with lots of opportunities and shorter walks?

        source
• ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Maybe OP believes every town in the US has exactly 1 church and 2 homeless people and is mildly infuriated that the church doesn’t allow the 2 homeless people to live there?

  source

  • lemming934@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I think OP believes every town in the US has twice as many homeless people as churches, it doesnt need to be exactly 1 church and 2 homeless people.

    But either way, that’s probably not true. Since homeless people tend to be in larger cities.

    But then again, lots of people become homless in the suburbs and then move to the city to get the social services. If churches in the suburbs housed a few people as they become homeless, it would probably help. It’s better to keep people in their communities so they have a better chance of returning to housefullness.

    But probably not that much, since homelessness rates are strongly correlated with housing prices, so expensive cities create more homelessness than cheap suburbs.

    source
  • RHOPKINS13@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Not sure why you'd think OP is saying 1 church per town. Just that there are ~380k churches in the United States, and less than twice as many homeless people.

    I agree, far too many people are left out in the cold at night when we have many public, climate-controlled buildings with working bathrooms and possibly even showers that are empty after a certain hour. If the homeless were able to regularly get a good night's sleep and a shower in, they might be more able to hold down jobs and become contributing members of society again.

    Schools certainly would be great as a shelter after hours, most have gyms with showers, possibly laundry machines, and certainly ample space for someone to sleep with a sleeping bag. If we could just figure out a way to make sure everything stays clean for students to use the next day, no left-behind drugs, no vandalism, etc. that could be a wonderful solution.

    My guess is that in most places the homeless population would easily fit within the gymnasium alone.

    source
• JargonWagon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  They’re implying that there are two homeless people for every church and that every church should house two homeless people to solve homelessness. Not agreeing with OP, just trying to answer your question.

  source

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    and that every church should house two homeless people

    Not even directly house. Even helping support those 2 people would go a long way toward demonstrating that churches actually do some good.

    source
• qooqie@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I’m also confused by what the image itself is trying to say

  source

  • Kolanaki@yiffit.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    If you take 2 of every homeless person in the US into one of every church in the US, there would be no more homeless people in the US.

    I am mildly infuriated at just how many people here are not understanding this.

    source
• dlpkl@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  There’s only two more homeless people than churches in the United States. If we make every homeless person a church, we can also have more churches.

  source