I mean given that the building still looks fine and did not just smash to rubble boy is that constructed well
Comment on Shhhh! it's sleeping.
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
What did that mean for the remaining instances of the same building? I imagine they were all built to the same high quality China is known for.
DeadDigger@lemmy.zip 14 hours ago
cloudpersona@lemmy.zip 15 hours ago
Actually this one wasn’t a case of bad construction quality, but bad oversight on surrounding projects. They compromised the foundation by digging out a bunch of earth next to it for another project.
web.archive.org/web/…/content_8394761.htm
turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 14 hours ago
In that case, the building might actually be built to a very high quality? I’ve never seen a building do that. I would think it’d save lives.
Hubi@feddit.org 14 hours ago
Right? I’m genuinely impressed it stayed in one piece. It looks like most of the windows are still intact too!
WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Now for sale: Luxury 1st story apartments
Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 hours ago
Like those 1960 mercedes that’d survive a car crash, but people were splattered around inside.
Also, the building looks like plastic, lol.
manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 3 hours ago
en.wikipedia.org/…/Collapse_of_Lotus_Riverside_Bl…
Found a wiki article about it cause I have to turn off my VPN everytime I accesses the wayback machine.
jlow@slrpnk.net 9 hours ago
Nice this (lengthy) article has a handy (if tiny) graphic of what the problems were:
web.archive.org/web/…/0022190fd2dc0bbe526726.jpg
InGodWeThrust@quokk.au 14 hours ago
I think the oversight must clearly have been someone holding the blueprints sideways while they were constructing it