Comment on Oh no

• FishFace@piefed.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Which is more than half of what you deserve!

  source

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Proud Feet!

    source
• mojofrododojo@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  survivor bias, ww2 south pacific combat, some anime character… and the realization that the algo doesn’t send ai slop your way because even the algo is smart enough to know you aren’t going to engage.

  dunno anything about the anime tho.

  source

  • Tenniswaffles@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I think it’s supposed to be you see less AI posts because they’ve improved to the point that it’s harder to tell what is and isn’t AI.

    source

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      oh I get that. It’s just not the case. I despise AI and work to root it out wherever it shows it’s ugly six-fingered head :D

      source

      • stoicmaverick@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Have you given any consideration to the possibility that you are fallible?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • tmyakal@infosec.pub ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        It’s just not the case.

        That’s literally the point of the meme: that there’s a point where it’s gotten good enough that you can’t tell. And some models are at that point. That’s why legitimate artists are now getting accused of using AI and finding it very hard to prove to people that they’re not.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      This

      source

      • UnequalExchange@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        That.

        This That. Tit Tat. 😋👍

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • zqps@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    There’s not supposed to be a content-aware algorithm on Lemmy, is there?

    source

    • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      The “content-aware” algorithm is people

      source