I think digitally verifiable ownership could be cool for, like, a digital TCG or something. But you’d need an actual use case for why this ‘ownership’ matters, which just isn’t true of the most noteworthy use of nfts.
Comment on one step closer to 100%'ing life!!
Kintarian@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It’s funny, when NFT’s started I said it was the dumbest thing ever and everyone online jumped all over me and down voted me into oblivion.
SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
KernelTale@programming.dev 1 day ago
I’ve never understood TCGs. Why not just print out the cards. Why not to use a randomizer to from which one should make up a deck for one duel. If the fun gambling and consumerism?
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
what you describe is called using “proxies” and different houses have different rules.
musubibreakfast@lemmy.world 1 day ago
The store where I play allows for 10 proxies per deck. In the olden days they’d take a finger for every proxy but now they just take a finger nail.
SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
I mean, yes, gambling is part of the fun XD
I don’t actually think gambling is the problem, capitalism is. A healthy amount of low-stakes risk taking is a perfectly good activity.
tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
The dangers of using reddit
AstroLightz@lemmy.world 1 day ago
See, you forgot the important rule of the Internet: Being first is the same as being wrong.
/s
HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
I thought the tech could maybe have a use case but PNGs was utterly useless.
ReluctantZen@feddit.nl 17 hours ago
Not sure what internet circles you were in, but I’ve hardly ever seen people be positive about NFTs in mine