You will munch on shag carpet and you will like it, you ingrate!
Comment on I’m personally just not a fan of Busch
TwistedTurtle@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
People that try to shame or attack others for their preferences come off as sad and petty to me at best, and borderline fascist at worst.
There’s endless systemic injustices and harmful ideologies to spend your energy fighting - stop trying to convince be to me angry at age gaps, men that prefer shaved armpits/pussies, women that prefer tall men, etc, etc.
I swear some of these people still want fascism, they just want on the opposite side of the spectrum.
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
sundray@lemmus.org 2 weeks ago
See, that’s exactly the kind of thing I want to hear.
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
snaps crop
couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Wait this is about shaved armpits?
sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
They be fair, the whole hair and woman thing is part of thelarger systemic injustice that women face. It’s one of those things where societal norm and personal preference blur together. It’s a tough one, for sure.
That said, I’m with you on the whole we’ve gone too far limiting peoples preferences and choices. It’s our differences and unique qualities and makes the world interesting (and possibly better).
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
I mean I get why some women choose to keep their body hair and I think that’s rad, but at the same time they can’t be upset if a man chooses not to get involved with them because of it.
People have preferences, and no one complains when women have grooming standards for the men they do stuff with
sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Totally. I only dated tall wealthy men with a full head of hair for the same reason. 😉
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
That’s fine as long as you don’t make a big deal about men who only date women based on their physical characteristics and their performance of traditional gender roles…
Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
I get the societal norm angle when we’re talking about armpits/ legs because you can see those. A girl could go to the beach and see all the other women/girls having shaved legs / armpits and feel gross or ugly for being the one with hair there and feel judged because it’s on display.
With pubes though you’re not going to see others so you don’t know the norm or have as much expectations on how a women should look, and other people, besides intimate partners, aren’t going to see yours so you don’t feel as judged.
eestileib@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Most women’s swimwear requires maintenance of pubic hair to wear without getting bikini spiders.
vivalapivo@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
How come not sleeping with me is systematic injustice. People have preferences and often unrealistic expectations, but it’s not the root of injustice.
sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
No, it is a symptom or piece of it.
Historically, women have been thought of as property of and existing for men. That manifests itself all sorts of ways, including but not limited to huge pressure to look and act in a way that projects submission or weakness (and conversely huge pressure to find weakness attractive). The hair is just one example. So, is it truly a preference or is it more of a social norm?