Comment on Men against bush

87Six@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• velma@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  If you watched the video, she is very specifically talking about men who are commenting about women’s body hair publicly.

  You can have a preference without telling random women they should shave because it’s your personal preference.

  I have a preference for trimmed or hairy, but I don’t tell people that they must quit shaving because I find it more attractive.

  source

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    How did you watch a video? I only see an un-attributed blurry screenshot.

    source

    • velma@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      OP linked it in a comment when they first posted and encouraged people to watch it:

      youtube.com/watch?v=OfSvnaMS7KI&pp=ygUSTWVuIHRoYXQgaGF0ZSBidXN2

      source
  • 87Six@lemmy.zip ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    wait I genuinely thought she was talking about president bush and I tried making a joke lmao

    source

    • velma@sh.itjust.works ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Maybe I’m the weird one for always reading all of the comments in a post haha. OP posted the video in a comment and it was immediately clear that this lady was talking about men judging women’s body hair publicly.

      The Bush jokes seemed like low hanging fruit that no one could resist.

      source
  • kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Who the heck calls body hair bush is my question then?!

    source
• NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Having a preference for A over B is not the same thing as hating B.

  source

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    On October 23rd, 2017, [Twitter] user @BravoCoolee made a post that read, “Twitter the only place where well-articulated sentences still get misinterpreted. You can say “I like pancakes” and somebody will say “So you hate waffles?” No bitch. Dats a whole new sentence. Wtf is you talkin about.”

    knowyourmeme.com/…/no-bitch-dats-a-whole-new-x-wt…

    source

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Sadly the twitter is not the only place that happens. It’s everywhere

      source
• TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  no, but considering the types of females that have no hair down there tend to be prepubecent (or have alopecia,) or the women who are concerned about early detection of STI’s, it does imply a kind of coding about the men who prefer it, rather than having no preference.

  source

  • velma@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Females and men.

    source

    • wabasso@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      I was about to agree with you but I reread it. Women is used as well, and the sentence that uses females is about their biology not choice.

      Still not accepting the argument about the implication on men’s coding though.

      source

      • velma@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        There was no need to use “females” at all in that sentence structure.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        It’s supported farther down as a indicator that the man sees women as equating to children, or sees the woman as permisuous. I promise you that in either case, i’m calling out mysogyny.

        source