Comment on He's an arborist
OldSageRick@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Method A on account that that would be the maximum usable length
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
undefinedValue@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
That’s not how it works with soft bodies though, method B represents potential useable length when pointing down. It’s only distorted because it’s pointing up. For rigid bodies, I’d agree.
lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 weeks ago
Nobody cares how long the limp branches are.
undefinedValue@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
Nobodies talking about the limp branches, soft and rigid bodies are a physics term and they don’t mean what you think they do.
lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 weeks ago
It was a boner joke, I could not care less about what these words actually mean.
Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
So… Non rigid?
anzo@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
Usable length is relative…
*reverse cowgirl enters the room, galloping backwards and surprising everyone*
AFLYINTOASTER@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
As a skilled carpenter who’s used to measuring wood, this is the only answer.
TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
Well… It kinda depends. If I were to be ordering stock to recreate the branch or even if I were making a covering for the branch. I’d have to order at least 6 inches of material to cut down.
So I think it matters most how you are intending to use it.
FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Oh you’re a skilled carpenter? How much wood have you cut in your time
Tess@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Half as much as they have measured, is my guess.
FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
THIS ia getting philosophical… i mean, first of all, things don’t need to be cut perfectly in half every time they’re cut.
But then your answer is probably an estimate/approximation.
HOWEVER… when you cut one piece of wood into two, is not 100% of the wood cut into?
So either this carpenter measures 50% of his wood aimlessly, or you, sir, are a LIAR
Akasazh@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I’m interested in your wood measuring services.
… For a friend