I’m an 80s kid but I skipped the old Twilight episodes … so I’m trying to darnest to catch up on them and I’m learning how awesome the ideas were even if the presentation is dated.
Just a random segue …
I sound naive but I didn’t realize that Rod Sterling wanted to tell stories about social issues – racism and stuff but the networks wouldn’t let him. If he wanted to tell a story about an alien or an invader then the networks would let it pass through. So it was a way for him to tell harder stories to the general public.
I think that’s a lot of sci-fi like Invasion of the Body Snatcher and such but I just never thought about it deeply enough.
There’s the treehouse of horror episode by the Simpsons where Bart is omnipotent and I knew it was based on something but I only recently learned it from: “It’s a Good Life” which is a book and a Twilight Zone episode. I only watched the parody up until this year and I just thought it was a fun concept. Then I watched the original and a breakdown and it was a take on totalitarian regimes.
LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Was the lady told what would happen if she pressed the button?
stickyprimer@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yes it was clear that someone somewhere in the world “who you don’t even know” would die. The characters have a debate:
“Maybe it’ll be just some Chinese peasant.”
“What if it’s someone’s newborn baby!”
More than anything I’m shocked at the casual dismissal of the Chinese peasant. WTF?
Anyway at the very end of the show the same guy who brought them this dilemma comes to collect the device and he very pointedly uses the same language to say “now it will go to someone new that you don’t even know.”
MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
en.wikipedia.org/…/Button,_Button_(The_Twilight_Z…
Yes, that somewhere in the world, someone she doesnt know will die.
When Mr. Steward returns to collect the button box after the button is pressed, the lady asks what happens to the box next. She is told it will go to someone else with the same offer, with assurances that the new recipient will not know who she is. As the previous commenter said, the wording deeply implies she would be the certain “someone” targeted by the next button press.
Emotional_Engi@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
But what would happen if she didn’t press it? Would the button be offered to someone else again? In that case, she would be targeted regardless of her choice.
katkit@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
That’s not revealed, but I would think it just targets the last person who pushed the button. If you don’t, you succeed the test and get skipped. .
dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
The dilemma is “would you push a button for money” not “would you push a button knowing what it did for money”
kartoffelsaft@programming.dev 1 day ago
“Would you push a button for money”, on its own, is barely a dilemma. If you’ve been given no good reason not to press it then you don’t have a reason not to press it. I’d be curious to see this Twilight Zone episode because, if it really is presented that way to her, then it’s not her morals that are comprimised and instead that of whoever distributed that button.
TeddE@lemmy.world 1 day ago
She’s told that someone on earth would die and she doesn’t know them. The twist is that while it’s implied that it’s a random person, it’s revealed at the end that it’s the last person to press the button.
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Some people are actually paid to press buttons.
LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 day ago
So, yes?
Folstar@lemmus.org 1 day ago
There’s this cool new thing where you can search for stuff on the Internet. You should check it out. To answer your question, yes - en.wikipedia.org/…/Button,_Button_(The_Twilight_Z…
LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Heaven forbid I try to have a conversation
stickyprimer@lemmy.world 1 day ago
There’s this cool thing called linking, too.