The craziest thing is that it’s not based on a book. Ths cultural capital of the 90s absolutely baffles me - so many profound but original movies! For a good 7-10 years, Hollywood wasn’t Hollywood’ing
IDK. I could see a sequel making sense. After Truman leaves, the dome is still there and all the infrastructure still exists. Why wouldn’t they just go again with another kid? Hell, maybe that just becomes part of the show’s appeal. You know they’re going to figure it out eventually, and all the drama is on seeing how long that takes and what the reaction will be. You wouldn’t even have to use many of the same characters.
Now Truman himself going back in the dome? That would be stupid.
I don’t know if you got today’s Jim Carrey to do a sequel where he’s disenfranchised by the world, where Truman has had his coattails ridden by porn stars and politicians and celebrities all alike, because he’s the most famous man on the planet, until they all got tired of him, and just left him alone in a strange world that he’s completely and totally unprepared for, having been raised in a 1940s nuclear family-esque society his entire life…
Then Christoph’s successor, Paul Giamati, comes and finds him in a bar one night and says, we’re doing the Truman Show again. Do you want to come back and be the new Truman’s father?
The whole show comes from Truman getting to re-experience everything that he went through from the other side, and figuring out how to rationalize that and make the best of the situation as he guides his child and protege through life in the Truman Show universe with Elan, then it could be a very good movie.
There’s a lot of allegory that it could rely on as well, Plato’s allegory of the cave, what it would mean to go back in the cave once you’ve seen the light outside, what it would mean to intentionally be an actor, creating a false reality for an innocent person to experience.
And what would happen if the new Truman, at the age of 19 or 21, suddenly realizes the truth of the situation, and everything goes off the rails again, and the original Truman is forced to decide whether to help his protégé either escape the show, and go through the same experiences that he had gone through outside of the dome, or to somehow convince him to stay, because now, with 30 years of experience, the original Truman knows better.
It could also play on the idea of older people with more experience knowing things that younger people do not, even though the younger people feel right and true and convicted of their convictions.
In short, I’m saying it might be worth a try. It just depends on the quality of the writers and the vision of the story.
Same! People don’t praise 90s cinema, but it seems like people love the 90s grain balance since they keep on using instagram + tiktok filters mimicking it
FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 1 month ago
The craziest thing is that it’s not based on a book. Ths cultural capital of the 90s absolutely baffles me - so many profound but original movies! For a good 7-10 years, Hollywood wasn’t Hollywood’ing
AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
And they didn’t try to make some stupid sequel, even though it was a big money maker. Amazing!
FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yes a sequel would be such a crap idea, but I would love to see the concept explored more in depth. A good ol’ TV series would have worked, or a book
AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
I think any attempt to continue that story would have been bullshit, like a continuation of Titanic. It came to a conclusion, let it be.
WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 month ago
IDK. I could see a sequel making sense. After Truman leaves, the dome is still there and all the infrastructure still exists. Why wouldn’t they just go again with another kid? Hell, maybe that just becomes part of the show’s appeal. You know they’re going to figure it out eventually, and all the drama is on seeing how long that takes and what the reaction will be. You wouldn’t even have to use many of the same characters.
Now Truman himself going back in the dome? That would be stupid.
bizarroland@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I don’t know if you got today’s Jim Carrey to do a sequel where he’s disenfranchised by the world, where Truman has had his coattails ridden by porn stars and politicians and celebrities all alike, because he’s the most famous man on the planet, until they all got tired of him, and just left him alone in a strange world that he’s completely and totally unprepared for, having been raised in a 1940s nuclear family-esque society his entire life…
Then Christoph’s successor, Paul Giamati, comes and finds him in a bar one night and says, we’re doing the Truman Show again. Do you want to come back and be the new Truman’s father?
The whole show comes from Truman getting to re-experience everything that he went through from the other side, and figuring out how to rationalize that and make the best of the situation as he guides his child and protege through life in the Truman Show universe with Elan, then it could be a very good movie.
There’s a lot of allegory that it could rely on as well, Plato’s allegory of the cave, what it would mean to go back in the cave once you’ve seen the light outside, what it would mean to intentionally be an actor, creating a false reality for an innocent person to experience.
And what would happen if the new Truman, at the age of 19 or 21, suddenly realizes the truth of the situation, and everything goes off the rails again, and the original Truman is forced to decide whether to help his protégé either escape the show, and go through the same experiences that he had gone through outside of the dome, or to somehow convince him to stay, because now, with 30 years of experience, the original Truman knows better.
It could also play on the idea of older people with more experience knowing things that younger people do not, even though the younger people feel right and true and convicted of their convictions.
In short, I’m saying it might be worth a try. It just depends on the quality of the writers and the vision of the story.
CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
The level of risk Hollywood is willing to take on today is very low due to streaming. There is more competition for people’s attention and money.
They would rather take an IP that they know is popular than to take a risk on something unknown.
BigDiction@lemmy.world 1 month ago
90s is my favorite era of cinema. I love that a look of a little film grain but everything is still really clear.
FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Same! People don’t praise 90s cinema, but it seems like people love the 90s grain balance since they keep on using instagram + tiktok filters mimicking it
djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
We need to legalize the fuck out of cocaine and make sure it gets back into Hollywood.