Comment on Open Carry Loophole

• FiniteBanjo@feddit.online ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Either the dog is a person and requires a permit or the dog is not a person and the gun is alone. You could even try to argue if a dog is a safe storage, to which I think it lacks several key features.

  source

  • GorillaSheep4130@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Safe Storage, of course! He’s a Good Boy 🫡

    source
  • gibmiser@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Alright, what if i… put it… inside…?

    source

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      If a dog is lacking key features to be considered safe storage the it is equally illegal inside or out, ignoring animal welfare laws.

      source

      • TheGoldenV@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        This guy reads the rules.

        source
      • FelixCress@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        You must be fun at parties.

        source
    • FelixCress@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Look in the dog!

      m.youtube.com/watch?v=RD6BaHKMTXk

      source
  • ivanafterall@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The dog is a dog. Not a person, nor a storage box. It’s a dog. That just happens to also have a gun. His choice not mine.

    source

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Yes it’s a dog. But the dog can either be considered a legal person or not, and depending on that the dog needs a permit or a human to safekeep the weapon.

      source
    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      If the dog is the owner of the gun then the only law you have to worry about is an illegally registered firearm on your property.

      source

      • ivanafterall@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        The dog had a gun, what was I supposed to do!?

        source
  • Sabata11792@ani.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    That dog is clearly open carrying and would not need a permit in my state.

    source