Regardless of which way it happened, I’d be crying a lot, especially if it happened in the 1800s.
Comment on Rough time to be a woman. ☕
victorz@lemmy.world 9 hours agoOr just the four of them together in one go I guess.
homes@piefed.world 9 hours ago
db2@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
In the 1800s you’d be counting yourself lucky you survived it.
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 5 hours ago
Food was much cheaper and you were allowed to put them to work right away.
Plus most of them died before five anyways.
homes@piefed.world 5 hours ago
Yes, the 1800s… When it was perfectly legal to put newborn babies to work in the coal-mining sweat shops of South London
sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 5 hours ago
Kids as young as 4 years old would be put to work, so it’s not that far off really.
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 5 hours ago
Not just legal but encouraged.
Lumisal@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Or 6 at once but 2 didn’t make it
pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 1 minute ago
Or octuplets born on new year’s eve so half were in one year and half were in the next.
victorz@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Now we’re going into bitch territory. 🐕
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Or triplets in January and one in November, or one in January and triplets in November (but it was definitely these two months). She’s crazy; capable of anything.
Mac@mander.xyz 11 minutes ago
I knew a set of quads in school. They were all really cool.