Comment on Biological Women

realitista@lemmus.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• abbadon420@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I was thinking “biological warfare”. Which still doesn’t fit all the references, but I’ll write it off as “artistic liberty”

  source

  • Klear@quokk.au ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    But that would imply scientific liberty, engineering liberty and, worst of all, AI slop liberty.

    source
  • realitista@lemmus.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Warfare of attrition?

    source

    • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      those are said by other people though

      source
• protist@retrofed.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I assumed it was “warfare,” and for that every example works

  source

  • realitista@lemmus.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Warfare of attrition? Warfare of mass distruction? There are, I guess, ways to say those things properly, but these aren’t them.

    source

    • protist@retrofed.com ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I suppose I was talking about the tweet and not the response to the tweet

      source
• ThermonuclearHoxha@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  “Biological warfare” does in fact exist, and can be compared to “guerrilla warfare” and perhaps “total war” as a type of warfare as a slight stretch.

  source
• ieGod@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Ah, a shit post enjoyer of refined taste I see.

  source
• silver@das-eck.haus ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  It’s warfare. The only one that doesn’t fit is “of mass destruction”

  source
• Pipster@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I dunno, referring to somebody as a “total weapon” is very valid here

  source
• Flyberius@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  #SILENCE!

  source