Ofc its a company with “AI first” philosophy
peacefulpixel@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
i still remember this game having AI Generated assets. that’s not exactly something i can look past. how ironic that the devs were taking an environmentalists angle for the first game, now we’re here
Mwa@thelemmy.club 3 hours ago
MBech@feddit.dk 7 hours ago
Success corrupts I suppose. Or is it another of those games with a completely different team doing the sequal?
peacefulpixel@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
from what i recall which may be wrong, the only people of the original subnautica team that were fired were the original 3 founders of the team. the rest of the team is in tact i believe
Guitar@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
If there are any AI generated assets, and I don’t believe there are, they certainly aren’t anything substantial. The devs have been showing off their work for months. At a minimum, the creatures, vehicles, bases, and writing is all created by humans. I know Krafton claimed a few months ago they were gonna start putting AI assets in their games, but from everything I’ve seen of Subnautica 2, it does not have AI generated assets. If you have a source that says otherwise, I’d be interested to see it.
OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 hours ago
IMO, ai-generated assets are not a deal-breaker, especially if it’s done in moderation. For example, using AI to generate the texture for a human-made 3D model.
If major portions of the game are AI-generated, that’s going to be terrible. But if they’re just using it as a shortcut to fill in some of the minor details, that’s probably fine.
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 5 hours ago
So you’re okay with AI taking texture maker’s jobs but not 3D modeller’s?
OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 hours ago
I don’t give a shit about anybody’s job. I’m just talking about what AI might or might not be able to do a decent job of and not ruin the product.