Comment on Dumb glasses

• Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Stopped this bullshit for a decade or so

  source

  • FishFace@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Stop advocating violence against people who might be recording video in public, just because the device doing it is on their face.

    source

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      You actually should advocate for violence against people who are violating your rights

      source

      • lumen@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        What right would be violated here exactly?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • FishFace@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        You don’t have the right not to be filmed in public. Do you punch every person filming in public? and if you punch someone wearing the glasses, most likely they weren’t even recording.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      A clear violation of the social contract deserves a swift response. Those glasses come off your face, and onto the pavement.

      source

      • lumen@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        No they don’t. I might actually go film on the sidewalk just outside your home, and there would be nothing at all you can do about it.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • FishFace@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Who made this social contract? I certainly didn’t. You want to be able to tell everyone else what the social contract is, and assault them if they don’t comply.

        Fascist.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      It’s easy to see someone holding up a camera or cell phone making it obvious they are recording. If you don’t want to be recorded, you can just stay the fuck away from them. You can’t avoid cameras/recording devices you can’t see. Fuck meta, and fuck anyone else wearing their garbage, privacy invading glasses.

      source

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        It’s easy to see someone holding up a camera or cell phone making it obvious they are recording.

        Really? I routinely keep my phone in my breast pocket whenever I wear a shirt with one, and enough of it sticks out for the camera to see above the top of the pocket. I’d look no different recording or not, let alone it being obvious if I’m doing it. It’d be shaky body-cam style footage, but that’s not the point.

        source
      • FishFace@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Yeah, it’ll be really hard to spot the giant dorky glasses with the laser beam recording LED.

        Of course, in practice you don’t behave differently when you spot someone holding their phone up in the street, because you’re already behaving like you’re being watched because you’re in fucking public.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Onyxonblack@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      If you wear the video glasses, expect to be fucking punched or worse. Jackass.

      source

      • FishFace@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        I’m not going to wear the video glasses. But if I see someone assaulting someone over some stupid gadget, I’m going to try and help that person. Take your violent fantasies elsewhere, sicko.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Nah. Violence against them is okay.

      source
  • lumen@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    But violence isn’t the answer. And certainly not to people doing legal stuff in public. Wearing a Google Glass in private is different though.

    source

    • Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      All I’m saying is last time this tech trend came around, enough people who had a problem with it took drastic actions that directly affected the popularity of wearing a spycam on your face.

      Wouldn’t surprise or upset me if history repeated itself.

      source

      • lumen@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Wouldn’t surprise me either. But it’s a hugely illogical reaction.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      doing legal stuff in public

      Just because its legal doesn’t mean its right

      source

      • lumen@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        See, what’s “right” is a (shared) opinion. One of the consequences of living in a free country is that other people can have their own opinions.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • FishFace@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        If you think something is wrong then, unless that risk places you at actual risk of harm, you can have that conversation - in public forums, at the ballot box, with your political representatives. If, rather, you want to dictate what you think is right on everyone, with threat of violence then that is something else.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      violence is the answer against people who already commit violence. reducing your sense of privacy and safety is violence. not to mention that this data could be used for ICE’s benefit, which would even add physical violence.

      source

      • StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        I agreed with you up to this statement, no Karen, getting filmed in public is not violence, even if it’s concealed, Jesus Christ

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • lumen@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Filming in public is not a form of violence in and of itself. Have you ever noticed that the public is called “public”, which is the opposite of “private”?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      When the law abandons the people, the law of the jungle returns.

      source
    • entropiclyclaude@lemmy.wtf ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      One of those people

      source

      • lumen@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        ?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Violence is SO often the answer.

      source
• starman2112@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Yeah, putting cameras in glasses is a really stupid idea

  source

  • lumen@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    People hitting other people because they don’t like whatever legal activities the other person is undertaking, that’s stupid.

    source

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      You would have fought for the confederacy because it was legal to own slaves

      source

      • lumen@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        No? I just don’t think filming in a public place is wrong. Why would it be? No one has been able to provide a reason.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• Quexotic@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  “Never believe that anti-Semites people like this person are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites people like this person have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”

  Jean-Paul Sartre

  source
• mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  pretty close to the brightest in the past decade, tho

  source