YouTube is awful for children.
Comment on BAAAAAABY SHARK DO-DO-DO-DO-DO-DO
hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks agoYour sister sucks, therefore YouTube is bad?
DagwoodIII@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
ICastFist@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
phones in general are awful for children
DagwoodIII@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
I’ve seen dozens of stories about how the schools the 0.01% send their kids to have zero tolerance for phones.
They can afford nannies to make sure that the next generation of leaders knows how to think
ICastFist@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
There are plenty of scientific studies on how bad they are, but since society and economic pressure demand parents to kill themselves for their jobs, it’s no wonder they have little to no energy to actually parent and resort to the easiest solution.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I’ve seen dozens of stories about how the schools the 0.01% send their kids to have zero tolerance for phones
Continuous glucose monitors update to smartphone apps. Zero tolerance phone policies are disability discrimination lawsuits waiting to happen and the schools the 0.01% have lawyers good enough to figure that out.
hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
While I agree that YouTube should be monitored, you’re making the same comment as someone in the 80s talking about cartoons on TV.
DagwoodIII@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
Meaningless argument.
Some one can say “I don’t like Nazis” and then say “I don’t like tomato soup” a week later. It doesn’t mean you can compare the two.
SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
[deleted]caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
We’re responding to the words you put into OP’s mouth, with your holier-than-thou attitude.
SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
[deleted]caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
I consider this to be a positive outcome.
JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Both can be true…