Considering that the peen is propped up by the part that continues inside the taint, either the dick anatomy and functionality isn’t quite entirely preserved, or the vagina would have to be plasted above the dick.
Comment on Anon beats his meat
turbowafflz@lemmy.world 1 day agoPenis preserving vaginoplasty is a thing. I don’t think it’s at all common but it is a thing
SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 11 hours ago
I think it just uses the canal that’s already there if you don’t opt for zero-depth. Not sure how functional the vagina is though, but iirc the penis functionality is usually preserved.
SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Considering the extent of corpus spongiosum, part of the root of the penis, I don’t see how you could shove it aside and put a hole and the vulva in there. Except if it’s some kinda microvagina.
Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Two words: inguinal canal.
Though that would still be awkward, as it would mean the new vagina’s off to the side instead of in the middle.
Not saying it’s for sure how it’s done (I have no idea on that), just that I think that’s the “canal” OP is referencing.
WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 10 hours ago
Do the balls just gone on either side of that then? Or do they push it out of the way?
rumschlumpel@feddit.org 22 hours ago
TIL futas are real
turbowafflz@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
Mmm, I would not recommend using that word when talking about real people