Comment on Anon beats his meat

• rumschlumpel@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  TIL futas are real

  source

  • turbowafflz@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Mmm, I would not recommend using that word when talking about real people

    source
• SlurpingPus@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Considering that the peen is propped up by the part that continues inside the taint, either the dick anatomy and functionality isn’t quite entirely preserved, or the vagina would have to be plasted above the dick.

  source

  • WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I think it just uses the canal that’s already there if you don’t opt for zero-depth. Not sure how functional the vagina is though, but iirc the penis functionality is usually preserved.

    source

    • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Considering the extent of corpus spongiosum, part of the root of the penis, I don’t see how you could shove it aside and put a hole and the vulva in there. Except if it’s some kinda microvagina.

      source

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Two words: inguinal canal.

        Though that would still be awkward, as it would mean the new vagina’s off to the side instead of in the middle.

        Not saying it’s for sure how it’s done (I have no idea on that), just that I think that’s the “canal” OP is referencing.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Do the balls just gone on either side of that then? Or do they push it out of the way?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  being nonbinary that sounds potentially good

  neat, TIL

  source
• QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  It is?

  source
• Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Yeah, but if you got one of those there’s no fucking reason you’d wanna go to ingerland

  source