Comment

sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

thats actually pretty interesting.

I’d be firmly on your side of that fence, the idea being its cute or cool cause it happened in real life. this is a recording of real life. if its a computer drawing using the severed and reconstituted husks of other things and did not happen, its just something completely different- would she watch a hand drawn cartoon of the same thing? Would she really?

Another possibly interesting way to tease it out, is say it’s a video of her close friend being given an award from a prestigious institution and she feels a sense of pride. Or, its a video from the same friend where her partner does something very sweet and poignant. In both cases, she then finds out that this never happened, its just a computer drawing her friend made of these non-events. Too different to draw out the reason while real vs fake matters? Possibly.

Say the video of a cat that can accurately work and excel spreadsheet. Does that one matter (spoiler, its REAL)

source

Sort:hotnew top

Hackworth@piefed.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Usually when people share a post, it’s because the post evoked a reaction, and they want to share that with someone. Making the conversation about the provenance of the post truncates the exchange in an unsatisfying way. For a news story, propaganda, or the like, the source is important. For funny dog videos? Maybe the quality of the exchange is more important. A nice middle ground would be to react as if it were true, and then point out it’s probably AI. Videos are easier to spot, but the difference between an image that’s obviously AI and one that looks real is like 10 min of work in Photoshop. So we’re often better off saving our faculties of discernment for the stuff that matters.

source
- SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Nah, screw that. I am disgusted by the way AI looks. I’d rather people not send me anything than to send me slop.
  
  source
  - DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    I predict you’ll get your wish.
    
    source
  - Holytimes@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    The monkey paw curls you only get photoshopped dick picks from now on.
    
    source
- sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  I disagree completely, but I mean your position makes sense.
  
  source
hansolo@lemmy.today ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Yeah, that’s what I was thinking as well, with the comparison to hand drawn animation. Honestly, I’m not sure, but I expect that would not hit quite the same way. Claymation…maybe the same, actually. It might also be just no glasses scrolling and quick reactions without discernment.

I’ve explained how to recognize AI videos, and she knows how to ID most (I hope), and I have noticed that she shows me fewer AI clips now. Not none, but fewer. I think she knows I don’t like them, and doesn’t want me too be the killjoy.

I even made a clip in Sora of our cat doing stuff, as an olive branch. I think that sort of made the point you were making about the friend getting an award.

source
- sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  this is all very thoughtful, and it seems like your thinking on it is aligned quite closely to my own.
  
  just to say, I think its understanding and kind of you to be hands off and respectful of what she enjoys. I find all gen AI slop disquieting, but if someone else really enjoys it with their eyes wide open, really who gives a shit, there are very real and serious things to worry about and someone liking an AI cat video or not prolly isnt one of them
  
  source