Almost everything on the market is shit and will destroy your hair. That includes the 6 in 1 shampoo, men just usually have less hair.
Comment on conditional soap
xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 1 day ago
Assuming there’s any truth to that, why wouldn’t women just use the 6 in 1 shampoo.
…And man-pants with pockets, while we’re on the topic. I suppose there might be issues in the hip-department there, though.
marcos@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
For the pants, it’s partly the hip/waist ratio and partly the extra bunchy fabric in the crotch region.
Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Some already do.
And man pants aren’t that big of a hurdle to get used to. Just need to take measurements of waistband and inseam and you’ve got the size to look for in mens pants. Thats what I like about them: they have much better sizing labels than the nebulous/arbitrary size numbers on women’s pants.
xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 1 day ago
Whatever works, right? Right now I’m wearing this really nice pair of sturdy heavy-duty felt-lined jeans from Duluth Trading Company which are supposedly made for women (albeit with perfectly nice pockets) - not that I care one whit. They fit perfectly, and are generally lovely.
absentbird@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
It’s nonsense, and men with longer hair who use 6 in 1 have bad results. Longer hair takes more treatment, hair is usually vitalized by oils from the scalp, so the further away from the scalp the more help it needs to stay healthy.
atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
When I was in high school the trend was baggy pants and lots of women did wear men’s pants.
the_q@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Hip stuff only matters if you’re trying to have form fitting clothing. It sucks for women, but at the same time you’re not required to buy that crap. Be comfortable.
protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
are they even form fitting clothes for man? I just buy the cheapest man pants that are baggy, fit me, is compatible with belts and is made with 100% cotton
the_q@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
I don’t know. I also just buy for comfort/utility. I ain’t no fashion model.
ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 1 day ago
I think it’s not so much the shampoo but a mix of most men using shorter haircuts and doing less damaging things to their hair, like hair colouring.
And it’s not like there aren’t specialized shampoos targeting primarily men. I think I never saw a dandruff shampoo marketed towards women.
xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 1 day ago
Huh. Is dandruff not a thing that happens to women? I wouldn’t know.
ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 1 day ago
From what I could find, men are more likely to suffer from dandruff than women, so even though women can suffer from dandruff it makes sense from a marketing perspective to focus mostly on men, especially since men are still thought that any even cosmetically adjacent is not manly.
DahGangalang@infosec.pub 1 day ago
Its my understanding it does, but is generally far less noticeable (gets caught and held in hair, then washed out when bathing) but is usually cared for / treated by using proper hair products.