Comment on Omg

leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• lividweasel@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Maybe we should be calling it “Stone/Henge” then

  source

  • pennomi@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Stone plus Henge. Henge is not a prehistoric megalith unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning Stone system made useful by the Stone corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full megalithic structure as defined by neolithic hunter-gatherers.

    source

    • very_well_lost@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I will never get sick of this ridiculous copypasta

      source
    • mech@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Found the Slackware user.

      source
  • ivanafterall@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    That’s exactly how I’ve always pronounced it, too.

    source
• Saapas@piefed.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Something I learned from QI

  Stonehenge is not a true henge, as its ditch runs outside its bank, although there is a small extant external bank as well.

  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henge

  source

  • Wolf314159@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    The article you keep linking disagrees.

    Although having given its name to the word henge, Stonehenge is atypical in that the ditch is outside the main earthwork bank.

    An atypical example of something is still a “true” example of the thing, especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.

    source

    • Saapas@piefed.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I keep linking..?

      An atypical example of something is still a “true” example of the thing, especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.

      I think the article is a bit confused in both defining the “henge” and saying if it is a henge or not. It sets a definition that Stonehenge doesn’t follow, calls it “atypical”, says it’s not “true” henge (whatever that means) and so on. And all of those seem to be not directly sourced. One of the sources makes the confusion even worse:

      Ironically, even though Stonehenge has an earthwork circle around it (the earliest phase of the monument), it isn’t officially a ‘proper’ henge, as the main ditch is external to the main bank. It has to make do with being a ‘proto-henge’.

      I guess in this use it a “proper” ("true”?) henge is a henge and “proto-henge” is not a henge but a thing that precedes them. That’d explain some of the confusion. Could also be that “proto-henge” is counted as a form of a henge, but I’m not sure. Other examples seem to consider it preceding actual henges.

      It would help if there was one definition for henge but there seems to be some that define it like in the article, with the ditch inside and others that just include a ditch.

      especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.

      Terms can change over time, it could be the definiton of “henge” has changed.

      source