Comment on Not impressed

• grue@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Of course there’s such a thing as a fish! A fish is any swimming vertebrate (or its descendant), such as a tuna, or a duck, or a human.

  source

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    You believe in cladistics or you don’t, cowards!

    source
  • runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Being cold blooded and living “wholly in water” are also requirements.

    source

    • grue@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Nah, phylogenetically speaking, all descendants of fish must also be fish, by definition. Therefore, “being cold blooded” cannot also be a criterion (not that it would work anyway since tuna are warm blooded, BTW, and nobody would argue tuna aren’t fish).

      The “living wholly in water” criterion actually works, though: land-fish (e.g. humans) live inside a bag of water that we carry with us.

      source
• zakobjoa@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Podcast mentioned.

  source
• Wander@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  If I went down that rabbithole I think she would have punched me

  source
• BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Still an animal though

  source
• Spacehooks@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  No such thing as birds.

  source

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Yes there are, they’re a kind of dinosaur

    source