Nah, this is just one horribly unoptimized game.
Coelacanth@feddit.nu 1 month ago
250GB install sizes plus an additional 100GB shader caches. This is what the future looks like, buckle up.
snooggums@piefed.world 1 month ago
Montagge@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
250GBs? Cries in DSL
ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM:
Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system OS: Windows 10 / Windows 11 Processor: Intel Core i7-9700 / AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Memory: 16 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 / AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT / Intel Arc A580 Storage: 100 GB available space Additional Notes: Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system. Requires 8 CPU Cores for processor. Requires 8 GB VRAM for graphics. SSD storage required
oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Holy shit a 2070 for minimum specs!!!
oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Game doesn’t look good enough to justify a 20 series card, probably has mandatory raytracing but holy fuck that’s bad
Jrockwar@feddit.uk 1 month ago
For a cartoon game.
With the aesthetics they have, they could have been playable on the steam deck without anybody noticing the difference in graphics.
Why do they need 2-billion-polygon rocks only to flatten them all out and make it look like a cardboard cutout? It’s ridiculous.
Quill7513@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
managers have insane priorities
MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
It could have looked like BL2 with a few upgrades and more physics and that would have been fine.
SmoochyPit@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
BL2 even had some PhysX simulations when using an Nvidia card for particles and effects, so between those and running at higher internal resolutions and framerates, it’s already better than the new one in some areas.