Nah, this is just one horribly unoptimized game.
Coelacanth@feddit.nu 5 weeks ago
250GB install sizes plus an additional 100GB shader caches. This is what the future looks like, buckle up.
snooggums@piefed.world 5 weeks ago
Montagge@lemmy.zip 5 weeks ago
250GBs? Cries in DSL
ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM:
Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system OS: Windows 10 / Windows 11 Processor: Intel Core i7-9700 / AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Memory: 16 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 / AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT / Intel Arc A580 Storage: 100 GB available space Additional Notes: Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system. Requires 8 CPU Cores for processor. Requires 8 GB VRAM for graphics. SSD storage required
oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
Holy shit a 2070 for minimum specs!!!
oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
Game doesn’t look good enough to justify a 20 series card, probably has mandatory raytracing but holy fuck that’s bad
Jrockwar@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
For a cartoon game.
With the aesthetics they have, they could have been playable on the steam deck without anybody noticing the difference in graphics.
Why do they need 2-billion-polygon rocks only to flatten them all out and make it look like a cardboard cutout? It’s ridiculous.
Quill7513@slrpnk.net 5 weeks ago
managers have insane priorities
MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
It could have looked like BL2 with a few upgrades and more physics and that would have been fine.
SmoochyPit@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
BL2 even had some PhysX simulations when using an Nvidia card for particles and effects, so between those and running at higher internal resolutions and framerates, it’s already better than the new one in some areas.