So putting semen up a vagina without consent isn’t rape?
Comment on New idea
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month agoThe word you’re looking for is “artificial insemination” and it does not equate to rape.
Genius@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
So putting semen up a vagina
without consentisn’t rape?The concept of consent does not apply for livestock. And yes, in the context of artificially inseminating livestock, that is correct.
Genius@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
In what context? Animals? Are you saying a guy sticking his dick in his pet dog is a situation without any consent problems?
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Is “sticking your dick in a pet dog” the same as artificially inseminating livestock? No, it’s obviously not even close to the same thing? Then, obviously, no.
blackris@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
So you are saying rape doesn’t exist in a slavery context.
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
No, slavery does not apply to livestock.
Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
The concept of consent does not apply for livestock in this context.
The concept of human rights does not apply for when I shove a boot up your ass after you’re done licking the dairy industry’s.
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Nope, it still applies because I’m a human.
Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Disgusting comment, it doesn’t stop being rape because the species are different.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
it’s a veterinary procedure
Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Ok buddy, explain to me the difference between artificial insemination and rape.
I’ll wait
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
I am sure laws vary by country, but going with laws here…
One is done with a glorified Turkey baster to livestock. The other with your penis to a woman.
Are we seriously comparing women to livestock here? But even AI to a human woman would be sexual assault, not rape.
Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
One is done with a glorified Turkey baster to livestock. The other with your penis to a woman.
Both are non-consensual penetrations of animal vaginas. The actors involved need not be the same species, as in bestiality, and the thing used to penetrate need not be a body part. How would you like it if the women loved ones in your life were vaginally penetrated with Turkey basters instead of penises? Makes no difference because the deed is the same: concent is violated and in a sexual (read: vaginal body parts = sexual body parts) manner.
I’m not comparing women to livestock in the slightest, you’re putting words in my mouth. I’m saying that actions of rape DONE TO BOTH women and animals bear exact similarity. There is no difference between artificial insemination without consent of women as for animals, and there is no difference between vaginal intercourse without consent of animals as for women. Both of these instances constitute rape.
And artificial insemination without consent to a women is absolutely rape. It consists of vaginal penetration without consent. That is literally the definition.
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
You must either life under a different legal system or your farmers are shagging their cattle to inseminate them for it to be rape.
Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Watch rapists try this one nasty trick.
bdonvr@thelemmy.club 1 month ago
Alright then c’mon over buddy I’ll get the turkey baster ready
I’m not even vegan but wtf is this logic
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
False equivalency; I am not a cow.
bdonvr@thelemmy.club 1 month ago
…can animals not be raped?
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Of course they can, however artificially inseminating livestock is not rape.