Have you read Anathema?
Comment on functional
BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Listen, Pythagoras gives us the hands down best way to tell intelligent life visiting earth that we’re intelligent. Drawing a right triangle and marking the sides with 3 dots, 4 dots, and 5 dots immediately demonstrates that we are a sapient species that has developed mathematics with no need for a device or language. Of course, we’re all carrying devices these days, so maybe that’s no longer relevant.
EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world 1 day ago
SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
The romantic fantasy novel?
RupeThereItIs@lemmy.world 1 day ago
If we ever do met intelligent alien life, there’s no guarantee such a thing will make any sense to them.
I mean, for one, they may not have eyes to see your drawing among a million other likely faulty assumptions in your scenario.
Uli@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
But if they evolved to be right triangles with their sides marked by three dots, four dots, and five dots, then the message will be spot on.
fishos@lemmy.world 1 day ago
If they can’t “see”, then how would they every travel intersimensionally? Seriously, they’ve have some form of sight sense, even if it’s braille.
And the point is that math is indeed universal. The ratio of a triangle will never change. And again, if you’re a space fairing civilization,you’d have figured out triangles. You’re confusing differences in culture with basic rules of the universe. It’d be like saying “what if they don’t know what gravity is?” like they just somehow float around because they’re ignorant of the laws of gravity.
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 day ago
Braille very specifically isn’t sight sense… Which I assume is probably a typo.
Have I got a book recommendation for you btw
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Hail_Mary
fishos@lemmy.world 1 day ago
No, it’s not a typo. I’m pointing out that even if they have no eyes, they’d still have sensory input and within that input you’d still find “visual descriptions”. You can still describe something as square or round or “emanates this wavelength of light” without eyes. Eyes are not a prerequisite for describing things.