Comment on functional

<- View Parent
fishos@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

No, it’s not a typo. I’m pointing out that even if they have no eyes, they’d still have sensory input and within that input you’d still find “visual descriptions”. You can still describe something as square or round or “emanates this wavelength of light” without eyes. Eyes are not a prerequisite for describing things.

source
Sort:hotnewtop