Look to public transit development in Taiwan as an example of how to do it right in a democratic nation. There are still loads of problems but the Taiwanese government can’t just take your land outright. Taipei especially has seen phenomenal growth in its metro development in the last 20 years.
Comment on Public transit in Chengdu, China versus Toronto, Canada
rustydomino@lemmy.world 2 days agoIt helps that in China you can’t own land. All the land is owned by the government. You only have “use rights” and for a limited time (something like 80 years - I forget the exact number). So when it comes time to build infrastructure the government just tells you to gtfo.
rustydomino@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 day ago
The government of Taiwan is the Chinese government
mlg@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Just like how Pakistan administers Jammu & Kashmir and India administers AJK & Gilgit Baltistan, both of which are across the Line of Control in the opposite country’s border lol.
Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 day ago
LOL
Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 day ago
China has stronger property laws than the US, look up stuck nail houses. If the US ants your property, they can eminent domain your shit. In China, developers have literally had to swerve highways around property or build shopping centers around that one person who wont sell
jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Lies. My family had a factory in Wuxi, China. 2 buildings that were dedicated to dormitories. 4 buildings dedicated to manufacturing promotional products.
We were able to lease the land for 50 years with a 50-year option at the end of the term.
Around year 5, the government decided to turn the main dirt road into a proper road. They took back 1/4 of the land. They just used our area for staging.
About a year after the road was made, they decided to expand the road. They took back now 1/2 of the original land and buildings.
Less than a year after the expansion, they turned the 4 lane road i to a highway. They took the entire land back. My family invested millions of dollars in buildings and infrastructure. We got back pennies on the dollar spent on the investment on compensation.
My family never fully recovered financially.
Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 day ago
Huh, if the government has that power, why don’t they use it for stuck nail houses? I talked to a few people in shenzhen who made significant sums selling land to developers.
Different type of ownership due to your family purchasing the land vs inheriting it? Different provinces?
jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
I don’t know. Wuxi is significantly smaller than Shenzhen. I think it was around 2 million people at that time.
They didn’t give my parents much of an option. When they did finally take the land away, they did offer to relocate us to another location, but at that time, my family was already struggling from the 2nd loss, my parents just ended up closing the business all together.
Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’m sure that’s the whole story.
gurnu@lemmy.world 2 days ago
And China has slave labor
zbyte64@awful.systems 1 day ago
I mean so does the United States thanks to the 13th amendment but we don’t have anywhere near the same infrastructure to show for it
clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
American slave labor isn’t used for anything interesting - it’s just letting companies pay less for labor for their own benefit.
zbyte64@awful.systems 1 day ago
And what do interesting things are the Uighurs are making that is so interesting?
greywolf0x1@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
Proof or I don’t believe.
ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Wait until you hear about the UK! I own the freehold to my land, but technically it’s gramted by the crown, so I could in theory at any moment have my home taken from me.
Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Wrong, the state owns the land but you can own the house, and not just for your 70y BS period.
There are plenty of articles like of instances where homeowners don’t want to sell for infrastructure like this: twistedsifter.com/…/china-builds-highway-around-h…
I know for a fact here in EU or the US they will indeed " just tells you to gtfo"
BTW, in China a high 90% of people OWN their house and aren’t rentslaves.
So there’s that China bad man.protist@mander.xyz 1 day ago
It’s hard to overstate how much safer and more ethical it is to use eminent domain and fairly compensate someone monetarily for their property than to leave their house in the middle of a highway
Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 day ago
That’s besides the point wether you think it’s better or not, it should be the OWNER’s decision as is the case in China.
And not what this rustydomino is pulling out of his ass.protist@mander.xyz 1 day ago
No it’s not besides the point, it’s in direct response to your point. Leaving a house in the middle of the highway is a better outcome for no one
Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 day ago
I’m sure the developers offered “fair compensation”, you need to demand lot before fucking up the highway design is more economical.
protist@mander.xyz 1 day ago
In the US, the government provides compensation, not developers, and they pay fair market value as determined by local appraisal districts.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 days ago
America is no different. Try not paying your land tax.
The only difference is that, in America, someone needs to shout “eminent domain!” first and slip you $500 for your house.
deddit@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Isn’t this post about Canada?