Thus is the kind of legalistic bullshit interpretation I can get right behind
Comment on I dont want to enter a contract when consuming your product..
zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It says you’re bound by “opening and using” the product, rather than “opening or using”. Have someone else open it for you. Then neither of you have done both.
naught101@lemmy.world 1 day ago
kautau@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Contractual malicious compliance let’s go
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yeah but just ro be clear, the terms are likely there for a reason and using this product probably has risks associated.
undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 1 day ago
I think it should be “and/or” because if it’s just “or” than the terms would only apply if you either open it or use it.
cornshark@lemmy.world 1 day ago
No, that’s xor
bdonvr@thelemmy.club 1 day ago
I think having someone open if for you still counts. You’d have to already find one opened.
Taleya@aussie.zone 1 day ago
Leave it in a workplace fridge with a clear sticker saying “MIKES DO NOT TOUCH”
SimpleMachine@sh.itjust.works 2 hours ago
Go one step further and have someone under 18 who cannot legally enter into a contract open it haha